The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1999.19520305.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal maturity in Pakistani children

Abstract: Skeletal maturity in 750 normal Pakistani children (400 males, 350 females) aged 1-18 y was determined by the Greulich-Pyle atlas system. Male children during first year and female children during first 2 y of life matured in conformity with Greulich-Pyle standards. After that period mean bone ages were lower than the American standards up to 15 y in males and 13 y in females (at or around puberty), which may be due to malnutrition, ill health or other environmental factors. After puberty bone ages wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
14
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…= 2; range: [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Of these, 62 were 18 or over at the time of these assessments.…”
Section: General Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 2; range: [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Of these, 62 were 18 or over at the time of these assessments.…”
Section: General Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used and most accepted method of this group worldwide is the atlas method of Greulich and Pyle. Both its clinical [18,23,[26][27][28] and its forensic applicability [38] have been demonstrated in several studies. Due to the more relevant reference population, the atlas method of Thiemann and Nitz can be recommended for forensic age diagnostics as well [31,34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While an abundance of studies have provided valuable documentation of skeletal growth variation between populations (Garn and Clark, 1976;Rikhasor et al, 1999;Schaefer and Black, 2005), little is known of the degree and causes of intrapopulation variation, which may provide insight into complex patterns of ontogenetic allometric variability within a particular population (Pinhasi et al, 2011). Intrapopulation variation is defined as the biological variation observed within a single population, which is relatively homogenous for environmental, biological and social influences (Vercellotti and Piperata, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%