2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00283-016-9685-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal Geometric Complexes and Their Symmetries

Abstract: Polyhedra and polyhedron-like structures have been studied since the early days of geometry (Coxeter [5]). The most well-known are the five Platonic solids -the tetrahedron, octahedron, cube, icosahedron, and dodecahedron. Book XIII of Euclid's "Elements" [10] was entirely devoted to their mathematical properties.In modern terminology, the Platonic solids are precisely the regular convex polyhedra in ordinary Euclidean space E 3 . Historically, as the name suggests, these figures were viewed as solids bounded … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we generalise Ringel's approach in two directions. If we do not insist that each symbol appears exactly twice, we may use such schemes to describe the combinatorial structure of more general polygonal complexes in the sense of Schulte et al [53,54,55,72]. On the other hand, if we allow symbols with a single appearance, we may describe chemical structures, such as benzenoids as graphs embedded in a surface with a boundary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we generalise Ringel's approach in two directions. If we do not insist that each symbol appears exactly twice, we may use such schemes to describe the combinatorial structure of more general polygonal complexes in the sense of Schulte et al [53,54,55,72]. On the other hand, if we allow symbols with a single appearance, we may describe chemical structures, such as benzenoids as graphs embedded in a surface with a boundary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we generalise Ringel's approach in two directions. If we do not insist that each symbol appears exactly twice, we may use such schemes to describe the combinatorial structure of more general polygonal complexes in the sense of Schulte et al [56][57][58]75] On the other hand, if we allow symbols with a single appearance, we may describe chemical structures, such as benzenoids as graphs embedded in a surface with a boundary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28] Example 1. A typical example of a polygonal complex in the sense of Schulte et al [56][57][58]75] is a 2-dimensional skeleton of the tesseract (the 4-dimensional cube, see Figure 1). This skeleton is composed of 16 vertices, 32 edges and 24 quadrilateral faces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polygons and polyhedra we discuss in this paper are skeletal. Our definitions are adapted from Gru ¨nbaum (1977, 2010a) and from Schulte & Weiss (2017).…”
Section: Parallelohedra and Zonohedramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Would it suffice to translate the edges of a skeletal polyhedron P, creating a web in three-dimensional space whose edges and vertices are all translates of P? And parallelohedra need not be finite (see Schulte & Weiss, 2017). Infinite parallelohedra are an interesting chapter in this stilldeveloping field.…”
Section: Skeletal and Infinite Parallelohedramentioning
confidence: 99%