“…Additionally, the late‐Mississippian period is associated with sociopolitical organization which includes a differential mortuary treatment (mound versus village), arguably indicating the presence of social elites of ascribed and/or achieved status, which reflects some manner of hierarchical and/or heterarchical power structure (Saxe,1970; Peebles and Kus,1977; Steponaitis,1978; Bense,1994; Chapman,1994; Cobb,2003; Pauketat,2007). Health status differences have long been observed between mound‐interred (“elite”) and village‐interred (“nonelite”) individuals in the late‐Mississippian period; indeed, it has been the backbone of bioarchaeological inquiry for at least three decades (Buikstra and Cook,1980; Cohen and Armelagos,1984; Powell,1991; Boyd,1996; Danforth,1999; Larsen,1997,2002; Steckel and Rose,2002). This interment‐associated health disparity has also been amply demonstrated in studies of east Tennessee late‐Mississippian samples (Hatch and Willey,1974; Hatch,1976; Guagliardo,1980; Parham,1982; Hatch et al,1983; Jablonski,1983; Scott,1983; Richardson,1988; Betsinger,2002; Betsinger and Smith,2006,2007,2008; Vogel,2007).…”