2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal and Dental Stability After Maxillary Distraction With a Rigid External Device in Adult Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
34
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 30 full articles retrieved, only 13 studies fulfilled the final selection criteria and were included in the study. 2,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] No articles were found during grey literature searches or reference list searches. A flow diagram of the literature search is given in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 30 full articles retrieved, only 13 studies fulfilled the final selection criteria and were included in the study. 2,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] No articles were found during grey literature searches or reference list searches. A flow diagram of the literature search is given in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change occurred after distractor removal and closure of the posterior open bite that as created during the distraction period using guiding elastics. Most reports showed clockwise rotation of the maxilla [11,20] however, one study showed counter clockwise rotation of the maxilla after distraction [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The relapse was reported to be 22% after 3 years. [55] Internal distractors cause less psychosocial problems for the patient and are less likely to be loosened or displaced during the distraction period or following traumatic forces. Moreover, being more easily tolerated by patients, an internal device can be maintained during the consolidation phase for as long as deemed necessary for prevention of relapse.…”
Section: Maxillary and Midfacial Advancementmentioning
confidence: 99%