1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf02437238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
1,066
5
107

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,769 publications
(1,255 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
13
1,066
5
107
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex was estimated by scoring 23 characteristics outlined in Éry (1992) and Éry et al (1963). Adult age was estimated using degeneration of the pubic symphyseal face (Brooks and Suchey 1990), the sternal ends of ribs (Íșcan et al 1985; Íșcan et al 1984), and cranial suture closure (Meindl and Lovejoy 1985;Nemeskéri et al 1960). In instances of poor preservation, dental attrition scores were used to place individuals within a broad age group (Éry 1992;Huszár and Schranz 1952 estimates too broad for a single category were classified as "adult".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex was estimated by scoring 23 characteristics outlined in Éry (1992) and Éry et al (1963). Adult age was estimated using degeneration of the pubic symphyseal face (Brooks and Suchey 1990), the sternal ends of ribs (Íșcan et al 1985; Íșcan et al 1984), and cranial suture closure (Meindl and Lovejoy 1985;Nemeskéri et al 1960). In instances of poor preservation, dental attrition scores were used to place individuals within a broad age group (Éry 1992;Huszár and Schranz 1952 estimates too broad for a single category were classified as "adult".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the age range of adults in archaeological samples is still quite large (18-60 years), growth during this age period is limited when compared to the age categories preceding the adult stage. Estimation of age at death was achieved by combining the results of several different methods: sternal rib end deformation developed by İşcan et al (1984), cranial suture closure developed by Meindl and Lovejoy (1985), pubic symphysis changes developed by Brooks and Suchey (1990), dental attrition ageing published by Maat (2001), and finally the auricular surface ageing method developed by Buckberry and Chamberlain (2002). Estimation of sex was done according to the standards by Buikstra and Ubelaker (1994).…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When methods based on, for example, the pubic symphysis [51][52][53][54][55][56] and auricular surface [57][58][59][60][61] are considered, it is clear that their mean errors are also high. It seems that age estimation in adults still remains challenging, and that the Lamendin and modified Lamendin techniques are probably on par with other methods used in adult age estimation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%