2015
DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2016.1121989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sizing the optimal dimensions of a vaccine delivery system: a particulate matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unlikely that a stand-alone subunit or a combination of two subunits with adjuvant will be protective in humans. While a particle composed of MPL-AH and proteins was used for this study, either a better formulation or a unique particle may be required to maintain the antigen in lymph nodes to elicit memory (23,24). Nevertheless, the most important finding is that the vaccine formulation of S1S2 provided protection not only against the homologous S. Typhimurium but also against the heterologous S. Enteritidis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely that a stand-alone subunit or a combination of two subunits with adjuvant will be protective in humans. While a particle composed of MPL-AH and proteins was used for this study, either a better formulation or a unique particle may be required to maintain the antigen in lymph nodes to elicit memory (23,24). Nevertheless, the most important finding is that the vaccine formulation of S1S2 provided protection not only against the homologous S. Typhimurium but also against the heterologous S. Enteritidis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, non-proteinaceous subvisible particles with adsorbed protein can sometimes lead to enhanced immunogenicity, although not consistently for all types of particles and all proteins. It is worth noting that since particle size is recognized as a contributor to immune responses to vaccines 8284 , it is reasonable to assume that size may also be an important attribute to consider in the context of immunogenicity of therapeutic protein aggregates and particles.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the ideal encapsulating diameter for antibodies is in the micrometer range. Furthermore, it remains to be determined whether similar trends in particle diameters occur in larger animal models or humans and will require tight control over the distribution of particle diameters as well as the use of the most effective diameter characterization techniques 29 . There is also evidence that the surface chemistry of the particle can affect the rate of uptake by human dendritic cells in vitro 72 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameter of nanoscale biodegradable particles is a key dosage form parameter 2629 that potentially affects the magnitude of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells as well as Th1/Th2 memory subsets of CD4 + T cells generated by co-encapsulated immunostimulant/subunit vaccines after systemic immunization 30, 31 . It remains unclear, however, whether the diameter of co-encapsulating biodegradable particle affects the generation of mucosal and systemic memory T cells by co-encapsulated immunostimulants/subunit vaccines after mucosal immunization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%