1991
DOI: 10.1364/ao.30.004914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sizing fine particles with the phase Doppler interferometric technique

Abstract: A theoretical model based on the Lorenz-Mie theory was used to study the response characteristics of the Aerometrics phase Doppler particle analyzer (PDPA). The validity of the model was verified experimentally, and its suitability for calculating measurement uncertainties was established. The theoretical and experimental results suggest that size resolutions of the order of +/-0.3 microm are possible when the PDPA is used to measure small spherical particles (< 10 microm). We show that the optical configurati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed above, APS measurements made simultaneously with the PDPA do not exhibit any evidence of nonlinearities (see Figure 7). Thus, the current results strongly indicate that the PDPA response does become rnultivalued for small droplets in the standard configuration, and the observed structure is at least similar to the Mietheory oscillations such as predicted by Sankar et al (1990). Clearly, the use of the PDPA in this configuration to measure size distributions below about 7 p m can lead to ambiguous results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As discussed above, APS measurements made simultaneously with the PDPA do not exhibit any evidence of nonlinearities (see Figure 7). Thus, the current results strongly indicate that the PDPA response does become rnultivalued for small droplets in the standard configuration, and the observed structure is at least similar to the Mietheory oscillations such as predicted by Sankar et al (1990). Clearly, the use of the PDPA in this configuration to measure size distributions below about 7 p m can lead to ambiguous results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Changing the receiver collection angle to 70" in addition to using the short focal length lens resulted in more scatter in PDPA response than in the other cases, without a clear reduction in the multivalued response in the < 5-pm diameter range. Thus, increasing the scattered light integration at the receiver by using a short focal length receiver lens (compared to the standard lens) resulted in significant improvement in instrument response in the small particle sizing regime as predicted by the theory of Sankar et al (1990). However, reducing the component of reflected light received by placing the receiver at the Brewster angle of the droplets had a very small effect, contrary to theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the above observations are The vertical coordinate is the shifted altitude z s where the liquid water cloud top is defined as 0 m. The vertical coordinate is the shifted altitude z s where the liquid water cloud top is defined as 0 m. acquired at 40 Hz; this can then be used as-is, or averaged to 10 Hz or 1 Hz for convenience. Cloud drop size distributions are inferred from observations utilizing the Artium Flight Phase-Doppler-Interferometer (F/PDI) (Chuang et al, 2008), which measures the size of individual drops using the phaseDoppler interferometry technique (Bachalo, 1980;Bachalo et al, 1984;Sankar et al, 1991). The F/PDI and PVM-100A measurements can be used to check each other; we find during POST that the two instruments generally agree well once the difference in measured drop size range is accounted for, increasing our confidence in both data sets.…”
Section: Aircraft Observationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Techniques such as Phase/Doppler measurements [2], [3] or imaging measurements that rely on separate images of droplets [4] are ineffective near the injector orifice due to multiple scattering in the overall system. Signal attenuation for ensemble light scattering techniques utilizing visible wavelengths makes these techniques of marginal use in the dense spray [5], [6].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%