2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2018.5802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sizing and detailed design procedure of external rotor synchronous reluctance machine

Abstract: Finding an optimally designed synchronous reluctance machine with desired performance among all possible combinations of the stator and rotor with different shapes of barriers requires long execution time, which is an overwhelming task. Selecting the number of flux barriers, for instance, in accordance with the pre-designed stator has a significant effect on the torque ripple. To tackle these issues, this study presents a comprehensive design procedure of an external rotor synchronous reluctance machine suitab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In AF‐SynRM double layer distributed windings are selected. Although concentrated windings are easy to manufacture and their copper losses are small, distributed windings are selected for high reluctance torque 11 . For these reasons, 48 slots and 8 pole structures are preferred.…”
Section: Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In AF‐SynRM double layer distributed windings are selected. Although concentrated windings are easy to manufacture and their copper losses are small, distributed windings are selected for high reluctance torque 11 . For these reasons, 48 slots and 8 pole structures are preferred.…”
Section: Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of inner diameter to outer diameter is a value that varies directly proportional to the number of k d poles. This value is chosen between 0.72 to 0.74 in 8‐pole motor 11 . The initial values chosen for the design are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The former, e.g. 2D and 3D finite‐element method (FEM) as employed for radial and axial‐flux machines [1–4], although precise, are very time‐consuming and not suitable for the preliminary designs, while analytical approaches provide fast, flexible and relatively accurate calculations, introducing a powerful tool for the design procedure. The second technique may be divided into two categories: first, subdomain methods which are on the basis of Laplace's and Poisson's equations as used for surface‐mounted PM machines [5, 6], switched reluctance machine [7], and flux switching machine [8]; second, flux‐tube models or magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) approaches as used for salient pole [9], flux‐switching [10], Vernier [11], and switched reluctance [12] machines as well as magnetic bearings [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element method (FEM) is a powerful numerical technique in the analysis of electric machines SRMs to PM machines [1][2][3][4]; however, FEM is expensive and time-consuming. On the other hand, analytical approaches are fast yet accurate alternative techniques that are very effective in preliminary designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%