2021
DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucab058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sizes Are Gendered: The Effect of Size Cues in Brand Names on Brand Stereotyping

Abstract: Size cues are increasingly common in brand names (e.g., Xiaomi and Mini Cooper), but scant research has investigated whether and how brand name size cues influence consumers’ perceptions. This research shows that a brand name size cue can evoke gender associations, which subsequently affect consumers’ perceived warmth and competence of the target brand. A series of seven studies provide converging evidence that brands with a size cue of smallness in the name are perceived to be warmer but less competent, while… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the positive link previously observed between healthy consumption and some traits (e.g., calmness, intelligence) might not translate into a positive effect on perceived competence as a whole. Indeed, the broadness of our competence measure ("competent" and "capable";Aaker, Garbinsky, and Vohs 2012;Kervyn, Fiske, and Malone 2012;Zhang, Li, and Ng 2021) might have contributed to the variation in our findings. Second, the type of consumption might play a role.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the positive link previously observed between healthy consumption and some traits (e.g., calmness, intelligence) might not translate into a positive effect on perceived competence as a whole. Indeed, the broadness of our competence measure ("competent" and "capable";Aaker, Garbinsky, and Vohs 2012;Kervyn, Fiske, and Malone 2012;Zhang, Li, and Ng 2021) might have contributed to the variation in our findings. Second, the type of consumption might play a role.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Following the procedure used in prior research (Aaker, Garbinsky, and Vohs 2012;Kervyn, Fiske, and Malone 2012;Zhang, Li, and Ng 2021), participants rated Lauren on two warmth-related traits ("warm" and "friendly"; r = .85) and two competence-related traits ("competent" and "capable"; r= .92), all on seven-point scales (1 = "not at all," and 7 = "very much"). We averaged each pair of measures to create indices of perceived warmth and competence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, linguistically feminine names or size cues (e.g. little cafe and grand seiko) or lowercase letters of the brand also increase perceived warmth, which improves brand outcomes (Pogacar et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2022;Teng et al, 2021). And according to the name research in psychology (Du et al, 2021), we can infer that a brand name with easy recognizability is perceived as warmer thus is judged as more trustworthy.…”
Section: Meso-level: Corporate Imagementioning
confidence: 96%
“…little cafe and grand seiko) or lowercase letters of the brand also increase perceived warmth, which improves brand outcomes (Pogacar et al. , 2021; Zhang et al. , 2022; Teng et al.…”
Section: The Application Of the Scm In Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, congruence situation that is consumers high in femininity (masculinity) to rate feminine (masculine) brand leads to more positive brand evaluation compared with incongruence situation where consumers high in femininity (masculinity) to rate masculine (feminine) brand. These findings have been applied to a range of contexts including owners' attitudes towards the Porsche brand (Avery, 2012), spirit (Neale et al, 2016 ), human bot (Borau et al, 2021), size cues in brand names (Zhang et al, 2022), purchase decision of ethical product (Pinna, 2019), hand movement in advertising (Malik & Sayin, 2022), showing the robustness of congruence effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%