2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size structure and gear selectivity of target species in the multispecies multigear fishery of the Kenyan South Coast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results go in line with a worldwide pattern of fishing that has focused on high trophic levels (Kolding et al, 2015a). MTL values observed here (overall mean: 3.9) are higher than MTL values reported in tropical SSF of the Western Indian Ocean [2.3-3.6, Rehren et al (2018); Tuda et al (2016)], the Caribbean [3.3-3.5, Arias-González et al (2004)], the Indo-Pacific [2.4-3.7, Bacalso and Wolff (2014)] and other localities in the tropical eastern Pacific [2.5-2.9, Zetina-Rejon et al (2003) and Díaz-Uribe et al (2007)]. However, values of trophic level per species used in this study correspond to the adult phase of the species (FishBase, Froese and Pauly, 2017) and do not necessarily correspond to the actual trophic level of the size classes harvested per species.…”
Section: Size-based and Functional Indicatorssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results go in line with a worldwide pattern of fishing that has focused on high trophic levels (Kolding et al, 2015a). MTL values observed here (overall mean: 3.9) are higher than MTL values reported in tropical SSF of the Western Indian Ocean [2.3-3.6, Rehren et al (2018); Tuda et al (2016)], the Caribbean [3.3-3.5, Arias-González et al (2004)], the Indo-Pacific [2.4-3.7, Bacalso and Wolff (2014)] and other localities in the tropical eastern Pacific [2.5-2.9, Zetina-Rejon et al (2003) and Díaz-Uribe et al (2007)]. However, values of trophic level per species used in this study correspond to the adult phase of the species (FishBase, Froese and Pauly, 2017) and do not necessarily correspond to the actual trophic level of the size classes harvested per species.…”
Section: Size-based and Functional Indicatorssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Often fishermen increasingly target the low trophic level species because of their higher overall productivity, which also results in a decrease in MTLC but does not necessarily mean overfishing of the high TL species (Sethi et al 2010, Rehren et al 2018, Tuda et al 2016. Branch et al (2010) show that the negative trend in global MTLC observed at the end of the 1990s is no longer supported by the most recent decades of data.…”
Section: Mean Trophic Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Tuda et al. ). If proposed changes in one gear increase catch in the others, efforts to increase gear diversity, yields, profits, and sustainability will be challenged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%