1994
DOI: 10.1016/0044-8486(94)90103-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-specific predation of juvenile queen conch Strombus gigas: implications for stock enhancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean ratios of the height of the 8th and 9th carapace spines of wild crabs in this study are comparable to ratios reported by Keenan et al (1998) for wild S. serrata, whereas the relative length of the 9th carapace spines of hatchery-reared crabs was significantly shorter than that in wild crabs in both the present study and Keenan et al (1998). Similar observations have been made in the blue crab Callinectes sapidus, where hatchery-produced crabs were found to have smaller lateral carapace spines than wild conspecifics (Davis et al 2004), and in molluscs; both Stoner and Davis (1994) and Ray et al (1994) reported truncated and fewer spines in hatchery-produced queen conch Strombus gigas, when compared to wild specimens. However, the morphological characteristics were found to be plastic in these cases and could be altered by transferring hatchery-produced animals into the natural environment (Stoner and Davis 1994;Ray et al 1994;Davis et al 2004Davis et al , 2005a.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean ratios of the height of the 8th and 9th carapace spines of wild crabs in this study are comparable to ratios reported by Keenan et al (1998) for wild S. serrata, whereas the relative length of the 9th carapace spines of hatchery-reared crabs was significantly shorter than that in wild crabs in both the present study and Keenan et al (1998). Similar observations have been made in the blue crab Callinectes sapidus, where hatchery-produced crabs were found to have smaller lateral carapace spines than wild conspecifics (Davis et al 2004), and in molluscs; both Stoner and Davis (1994) and Ray et al (1994) reported truncated and fewer spines in hatchery-produced queen conch Strombus gigas, when compared to wild specimens. However, the morphological characteristics were found to be plastic in these cases and could be altered by transferring hatchery-produced animals into the natural environment (Stoner and Davis 1994;Ray et al 1994;Davis et al 2004Davis et al , 2005a.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Differences between hatchery-reared and wild invertebrates have recently been reviewed by Le Vay et al (2007) and may include colouration and pigmentation, claw morphology, spine development, shell thickness and behaviour (e.g. Ray et al 1994;Stoner and Davis 1994;Davis et al 2004Davis et al , 2005a. Identifying differences between hatchery-reared and wild organisms allows research to focus upon assessment of their significance and improvement of survivorship through development of appropriate conditioning steps (Young et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Unlike several other studies for fishes (Bolker and Hill, 2000;Kellison et al, 2000) and invertebrates (Ray et al, 1994;Stoner and Davis, 1994), which found reduced fitness of cultured animals, our tethering experiments revealed few differences in survival of hatchery-reared and wild juveniles. Simultaneous field releases of free-ranging wild and hatchery-reared blue crabs showed that, while juveniles sometimes suffered higher mortality than wild crabs, there were usually no differences in survival.…”
Section: Ultimate Impact On Stock Enhancement Successcontrasting
confidence: 38%
“…Given that the ECLSP population is aging, the cause of decline is likely tied to early life history. A key demographic rate for conch is high juvenile mortality prior to the formation of a larger shell that offers predation relief (Iversen et al 1986, 1990, Ray et al 1994. The ECLSP has one of the densest populations of grouper in the Caribbean (Mumby et al 2011), likely as a result of the effective no-take reserve regulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%