2020
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size‐selective predation accounts for intra‐ and inter‐specific variation of inducible morphological defense of Daphnia

Abstract: Inducible defense is adaptive when prey organisms cope with fluctuations of predation risk, and there exists ample variations of inducible defense both within a species and between species even in a single habitat. Daphnia, a freshwater zooplankton genus, shows remarkable inducible morphological defense when exposed to predators. This study explored the intra‐ and inter‐specific variations of inducible defense of Daphnia and tested whether the variations can be explained by the size‐selective nature of predati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found two morphological types of ephippia that originated from Daphnia pulex and Daphnia ambigua in the same sediment core samples, and we confirmed that ephippia of D. pulex have mitochondrial DNA of D. pulex (Otake in prep). Furthermore, previous studies have reported D. pulex and D. ambigua in Lake Fukami‐ike (Nagano & Yoshida, 2020; So et al., 2015). Thus, we identified the postabdominal claw with distinct teeth as the D. pulex and those without pectens as the D. ambigua .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We also found two morphological types of ephippia that originated from Daphnia pulex and Daphnia ambigua in the same sediment core samples, and we confirmed that ephippia of D. pulex have mitochondrial DNA of D. pulex (Otake in prep). Furthermore, previous studies have reported D. pulex and D. ambigua in Lake Fukami‐ike (Nagano & Yoshida, 2020; So et al., 2015). Thus, we identified the postabdominal claw with distinct teeth as the D. pulex and those without pectens as the D. ambigua .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example, D. pulex varies in vulnerability against Chaobrus larvae with growth stage, with high induction rates of neckteeth around the second instar, when they are most vulnerable (Lüning, 1992; Tollrian, 1995a, 1995b) and low rates outside the second instar, when they are less vulnerable. In other cases, using multivariate analysis, the degree of plasticity is found to increase during the growth stage of highly vulnerable body size of Daphnia , and decrease during the growth stage of less vulnerable body size, as predicted from size‐selective predation (Nagano & Yoshida, 2020). These results indicate that size differences among instar of Daphnia clearly affected the degree of plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Phenotypic plasticity is a possible mechanism contributing to changes in these traits. Indeed, Daphnia species, including D. pulex, have been reported to show highly plastic responses in various traits, including morphological, behavioural, and life history traits (Havel & Dodson, 1984;Herrmann et al, 2017;Loose, 1993), and significant morphological plasticity was also found in the studied population of D. pulex (Nagano & Yoshida, 2020). Phenotypic plasticity has been considered to aid colonisation to a novel environment and promote persistence of the population despite environmental changes (Hulme, 2007;Richards et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although a positive effect from planktivorous fish may sound counterintuitive, if these haplotypes showed strong defences against planktivorous fish, they might have increased as a result of apparent competition (Holt & Bonsall, 2017). Indeed, it has been observed that the clones of D. pulex isolated from this lake displayed significant variation in inducible morphological defence (Nagano & Yoshida, 2020). As for inter‐haplotype interactions, the effects of dominant Jpn2C on other haplotypes were positive, suggesting that Jpn2C would have not prevented the growth of other haplotypes through competitive interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%