2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-segregated particulate matter and gaseous emissions from motor vehicles in a road tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
36
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
8
36
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…5), and it was possible to observe an increase during the intensive campaign. In all campaigns, the values observed were higher than those observed in studies performed in the Amazon during the dry season with events of biomass burning (de Oliveira Alves et al, 2015); studies performed in different seasons in other urban areas such as New York and Madrid showed carcinogenic risks within the parameters recommended by environmental and health agencies (Jung et al, 2010;Mirante et al, 2013).…”
Section: Pah Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5), and it was possible to observe an increase during the intensive campaign. In all campaigns, the values observed were higher than those observed in studies performed in the Amazon during the dry season with events of biomass burning (de Oliveira Alves et al, 2015); studies performed in different seasons in other urban areas such as New York and Madrid showed carcinogenic risks within the parameters recommended by environmental and health agencies (Jung et al, 2010;Mirante et al, 2013).…”
Section: Pah Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…LCR from exposure to atmospheric PAH was estimated by multiplying BaP-TEQ and BaP-MEQ by the unit risk (8.7 ×10 −5 (ng m −3 ) −1 ) for exposure to BaP established by WHO (de Oliveira Alves et al, 2015;WHO, 2000) (Fig. 5), and it was possible to observe an increase during the intensive campaign.…”
Section: Pah Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the OC/EC ratios from these pollution sources and considering that the sampling sites were close to the coke oven, the primary source of OC and EC in the coking plant was the coking process. Table 2 compares the OC and EC concentrations and the OC/EC ratio in the ambient air of the coking plant with those reported in previous studies (Handler et al, 2008;Pio et al, 2011;Ducret-Stich et al, 2013;Alves et al, 2015). OC/EC ratios of 1.29, 1.67, 1.09, and 1.8 were reported for the ambient air of coking plant, highway, urban roadway tunnel, and industry.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Oc and Ecmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…These ratios all being lower than 2 suggest that the OC and EC pollutions near these sources mainly originated from primary emission (Turpin and Huntzicker, 1995;Chow et al, 1996). OC and EC concentrations were 2.76 and 1.65 µg/m 3 in the highway atmosphere, 29.6 and 27.1 µg/m 3 in the atmosphere of the urban roadway tunnel, and 6.0 and 3.9 µg/m 3 in the industrial air (Pio et al, 2011;Ducret-Stich et al, 2013;Alves et al, 2015). The OC concentration in the coking plant area was 169.6 µg/m 3 , which is 61.4 times that of the highway atmosphere, 5.7 times that of the urban roadway tunnel air, and 28.3 times of the industrial air.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Oc and Ecmentioning
confidence: 99%