2002
DOI: 10.3354/meps233273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-related differences in feeding habitat use of adult female loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta around Japan determined by stable isotope analyses and satellite telemetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
272
3
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(20 reference statements)
14
272
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Mediterranean adult loggerheads do, however, exhibit some variety in their movements, with some turtles foraging in offshore oceanic waters for at least part of their inter-reproductive phase, sometimes keeping on the move without fixing to any specific site (Zbinden et al 2008;Luschi et al 2013;Schofield et al 2013). This pattern too is in general accordance with recent findings obtained elsewhere showing how loggerhead spatial behaviour is actually characterised by a considerable complexity (Hatase et al 2002;Hawkes et al 2006Hawkes et al , 2007Rees et al 2010). This variability is likely linked to the loggerhead's plastic and opportunistic foraging habits (McClellan et al 2010;Reich et al 2010;Narazaki et al 2013), which allow them to exploit both neritic and oceanic foraging grounds.…”
Section: General Considerationssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mediterranean adult loggerheads do, however, exhibit some variety in their movements, with some turtles foraging in offshore oceanic waters for at least part of their inter-reproductive phase, sometimes keeping on the move without fixing to any specific site (Zbinden et al 2008;Luschi et al 2013;Schofield et al 2013). This pattern too is in general accordance with recent findings obtained elsewhere showing how loggerhead spatial behaviour is actually characterised by a considerable complexity (Hatase et al 2002;Hawkes et al 2006Hawkes et al , 2007Rees et al 2010). This variability is likely linked to the loggerhead's plastic and opportunistic foraging habits (McClellan et al 2010;Reich et al 2010;Narazaki et al 2013), which allow them to exploit both neritic and oceanic foraging grounds.…”
Section: General Considerationssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Papi et al 1997;Limpus & Limpus 2001), where females stay for long periods feeding on benthic prey and to which they show fidelity in successive reproductive seasons ). The most recent results have, however, revealed numerous exceptions to this general pattern, including the possible prolonged residence of females in the oceanic habitat (Hatase et al 2002;Hawkes et al 2006;Hatase et al 2007;Rees et al 2010), suggesting the possibility of epipelagic feeding in adults (Reich et al 2010), the presence of seasonal migrations between different feeding and wintering areas (Hawkes et al 2007;Zbinden et al 2008Zbinden et al , 2011 or convoluted segments in the migratory routes (Dodd & Byles 2003;Hatase et al 2007;Hawkes et al 2007) of uncertain biological significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial efforts have been undertaken to understand how differential foraging locations and oceanographic conditions affect demographic parameters such as clutch size, number of clutches per nesting season, clutch sex ratio, and female body size in loggerhead populations (Hatase et al 2002, Hawkes et al 2007a, b, Zbinden et al 2011, Bailey et al 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like mark-recapture techniques, satellite tracking requires that transmitters do not alter health or behaviour. To date, it has mostly been used for breeding adults to study post-nesting migrations from nesting sites to foraging sites (Balazs et al, 1994;Cheng, 2000;Godley et al, 2002;Hatase et al, 2002;Hays et al, 2001;Hughes et al, 1998;Limpus and Limpus, 2001;Limpus et al, 1992;Luschi et al, 1996Luschi et al, , 1998Morreale et al, 1996;Mortimer and Balazs, 2000;Nichols et al, 2000;Papi et al, 1995;Roos et al, 2001). This methodology was also used for studying movements and diving behaviour on foraging areas or nesting areas (Godley et al, 2002;Hays et al, 1991Hays et al, , 1999Hays et al, , 2000Hays et al, , 2001Renaud and Carpenter, 1994;Stoneburner, 1982) and seasonal migrations (Bentivegna, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%