2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01333-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size of the human corpus callosum is genetically determined: an MRI study in mono and dizygotic twins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For both methods, the volumetric correlation was higher, as expected, in the MZ twins than DZ twins, both subcortically and in the corpus callosum. These regions have previously been shown to be heritable ( [7] [26] [23]). We found that the parietal lobe volumes are relatively highly susceptible to shared environmental influences (exhibiting a high c 2 variance component), at least compared to occipital lobe volumes, which were predominantly under genetic control (exhibiting a high value for a 2 , the genetic variance component).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both methods, the volumetric correlation was higher, as expected, in the MZ twins than DZ twins, both subcortically and in the corpus callosum. These regions have previously been shown to be heritable ( [7] [26] [23]). We found that the parietal lobe volumes are relatively highly susceptible to shared environmental influences (exhibiting a high c 2 variance component), at least compared to occipital lobe volumes, which were predominantly under genetic control (exhibiting a high value for a 2 , the genetic variance component).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corpus callosum is known to vary widely across individuals (Beaton, 2004) and is also known to be variable in response to environmental conditions (Castro-Caldas et al, 1999;Kopcik, Juraska, & Washburne, 1986;Schlaug, Jäncke, Huang, Staiger, & Steinmetz, 1995;Strauss & Wada, 1993). Its size is also known to be highly heritable (Scamvougeras, Kigar, Jones, Weinberger, & Witelson, 2003). Thus, in families we might expect to reduce variability between participants, better revealing differences in the morphology of the corpus callosum related to reading ability.…”
Section: Study Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, this same argument applies to any claim of genetic biases causing cultural differences between human populations. Components (i) and (ii), concerning interindividual variability, are generally well-established for language either independently (Bartley et al, 1997;Lenroot et al, 2007;Scamvougeras et al, 2003;Thompson et al, 2001;Wright et al, 2002) or as a conglomerate in studies involving the heritability of language (Bishop, 2003;Bonneau et al, 2004;Felsenfeld, 2002;Fisher et al, 2003;Plomin and Kovas, 2005;Stromswold, 2001). Component (iii) concerns interpopulation variability and asserts that populations with different genetic structures could develop overt linguistic differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%