2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-002-0136-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size of craters produced by explosive charges on or above the ground surface

Abstract: The results of a series of tests performed with different amounts of explosive at short distances above and below ground level, as well as on the soil surface are briefly described. After an introductory description of both the main features of the blast wave and the mechanics of crater formation, a brief review of empirical methods for crater size prediction is presented. Next, the experimental design and the results obtained are described. The crater dimensions for underground explosions coincide with those … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
82
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of a series of tests performed by [5] with different amounts of explosive from 1 kg to 10 kg on the soil surface are used to calibrate the material and model parameters. The explosive charges used in these tests were Gelamon 80 a NG (Nitro Glycerine) based gelatinous explosive theoretically equivalent in mass to 80% of TNT.…”
Section: Comparison Between Numerical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results of a series of tests performed by [5] with different amounts of explosive from 1 kg to 10 kg on the soil surface are used to calibrate the material and model parameters. The explosive charges used in these tests were Gelamon 80 a NG (Nitro Glycerine) based gelatinous explosive theoretically equivalent in mass to 80% of TNT.…”
Section: Comparison Between Numerical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the numerical analysis of this paper, the soil properties included are obtained from the actual properties of the clay soil used in the physical tests presented by Ambrosini et al [5]. However, these properties are not sufficient to fully specify the parameters required to define a Drucker-Prager Cap model.…”
Section: Soil Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations