2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size‐mediated priority and temperature effects on intra‐cohort competition and cannibalism in a damselfly

Abstract: 1.A shift in the relative arrival of offspring, for example a shift in hatching time, can affect competition at the intraspecific level through size-mediated priority effects, where the larger individuals gain more resources. These priority effects are likely to be affected by climate warming and the rate of intraspecific predation, that is cannibalism.2. In a laboratory experiment, we examined size-mediated priority effects in larvae of the univoltine damselfly, Lestes sponsa, at two different temperatures (2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
41
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
5
41
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The colonization of habitats and arrival times of species or offspring in a seasonal environment is important in predator–prey interactions and in forming the structure of communities (Anderson, Rowland, & Semlitsch, 2017; De Meester, Vanoverbeke, Kilsdonk, & Urban, 2016; Rasmussen, Van Allen, & Rudolf, 2014; Salamolard, Butet, Leroux, & Bretagnolle, 2000; Shulman et al, 1983; Sniegula, Golab, & Johansson, 2019). For instance, a large difference in arrival times of nymphs of two dragonfly species causes the exclusion of a late arrival species (Rasmussen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The colonization of habitats and arrival times of species or offspring in a seasonal environment is important in predator–prey interactions and in forming the structure of communities (Anderson, Rowland, & Semlitsch, 2017; De Meester, Vanoverbeke, Kilsdonk, & Urban, 2016; Rasmussen, Van Allen, & Rudolf, 2014; Salamolard, Butet, Leroux, & Bretagnolle, 2000; Shulman et al, 1983; Sniegula, Golab, & Johansson, 2019). For instance, a large difference in arrival times of nymphs of two dragonfly species causes the exclusion of a late arrival species (Rasmussen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is known as priority effects, which emphasize how the sequence of breeding or other phenologies determine interaction strength. Priority effects are often size‐mediated (Rasmussen et al, 2014; Sniegula et al, 2019), as organisms emerge small and grow larger while their role as predators and prey shifts (Nosaka, Katayama, & Kishida, 2015). An early start can be a large advantage both in competitive and in predator–prey interactions, but is traded against the match with key resources during ontogeny (Durant, Hjermann, Ottersen, & Stenseth, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colonization of habitats and arrival times of species in a seasonal environment is important in predator-prey interactions and in forming the structure of communities [5][6][7][8]. This is known as priority effects, which emphasize how the sequence of breeding or other phenologies determine interaction strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For commercial use, contact journalpermissions@press.uchicago.edu. other patterns might occur (Ball and Baker 1996, Laurila et al 1998, Benard 2004, Costanzo et al 2011, Sniegula et al 2019b. However, few studies have focused on how predation risk during the egg stage affects the later larval and adult stages and whether a switch from high predation risk to low predation risk over ontogeny can be compensated for in later ontogenetic stages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%