2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size matters: What have we learnt from microcosm studies of decomposer fungus–invertebrate interactions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(79 reference statements)
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exclusion of invertebrates larger than 1 mm from recently cut logs significantly affected fungal community composition, confirming our initial hypothesis. This corresponds with previous studies that demonstrate an effect of invertebrates on the community composition of lower trophic levels such as primary producers (Schädler, Jung, Brandl, & Auge, ; Stein et al, ) and decomposers (A'Bear et al, ; Strid et al, ; Ulyshen et al, ). Our results also indicated that invertebrate exclusion decreased the rate of wood decay, since the wood density was significantly higher for caged logs relative to control logs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Exclusion of invertebrates larger than 1 mm from recently cut logs significantly affected fungal community composition, confirming our initial hypothesis. This corresponds with previous studies that demonstrate an effect of invertebrates on the community composition of lower trophic levels such as primary producers (Schädler, Jung, Brandl, & Auge, ; Stein et al, ) and decomposers (A'Bear et al, ; Strid et al, ; Ulyshen et al, ). Our results also indicated that invertebrate exclusion decreased the rate of wood decay, since the wood density was significantly higher for caged logs relative to control logs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Their meta-analysis indicates that, on average, direct mycelial grazing by invertebrates reduces fungal growth and increases wood decomposition. Up to a point, decay fungi are thought to compensate for mycelial damage caused by grazing by increasing enzyme activity and this, in turn, results in more rapid wood decomposition (A'Bear et al, 2014). There is a level of mycelial damage beyond which grazing has a neutral or negative effect on wood decomposition, however.…”
Section: (3) Biotic Interactions (A) Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably, priority effects of fungivorous beetles in early succession on wooddecay fungi in late succession are mediated through spore dispersal or preferential grazing. While preferential grazing can have significant short-term effects on fungal communities (Crowther et al 2011;A'Bear et al 2014), this mechanism inherently facilitates one fungus species while inhibiting another. As we did not find any negative relationships between fungivores and fungi in year 4 or year 12, we consider preferential grazing to be a less likely explanation for the positive effect of fungivores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%