2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-010-9299-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size matters: entrepreneurial entry and government

Abstract: We explore the country-specific institutional characteristics likely to influence an individual's decision to become an entrepreneur. We focus on the size of the government, on freedom from corruption, and on 'market freedom' defined as a cluster of variables related to protection of property rights and regulation. We test these relationships by combining country-level institutional indicators for 47 countries with working age population survey data taken from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Our results i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
320
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(340 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(65 reference statements)
17
320
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our understanding of individual factors enabling and hindering entrepreneurship has significantly increased, however, it is only relatively recently that researchers have addressed the question of how embedded entrepreneurial behavior is in national institutions. In particular, crossnational research has yielded valuable insights into formal institutions influencing entrepreneurial behavior (e.g., Aidis, Estrin and Mickiewicz 2010;Bowen and DeClercq, 2008;Djankov, La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes and Shleifer 2002;Levie and Autio, 2008;Van Stel, Storey and Thurik, 2007). By contrast, little research has addressed the role of informal institutions, including culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our understanding of individual factors enabling and hindering entrepreneurship has significantly increased, however, it is only relatively recently that researchers have addressed the question of how embedded entrepreneurial behavior is in national institutions. In particular, crossnational research has yielded valuable insights into formal institutions influencing entrepreneurial behavior (e.g., Aidis, Estrin and Mickiewicz 2010;Bowen and DeClercq, 2008;Djankov, La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes and Shleifer 2002;Levie and Autio, 2008;Van Stel, Storey and Thurik, 2007). By contrast, little research has addressed the role of informal institutions, including culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research typically regards this occupational choice to be akin to discovering entrepreneurial opportunities deemed worth exploiting through the creation of a venture (e.g., Aidis, Estrin, and Mickiewicz, 2012;Brixy, Sternberg, and Stüber, 2012). However, we know from longitudinal studies that follow nascent entrepreneurs -i.e.…”
Section: The Entrepreneurial Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aidis, Estrin, and Mickiewicz, 2012;Wennekers, van Stel, Thurik, and Reynolds, 2005). Studies contrasting influences on nascent and new business ownership using the same sample of countries are relatively scarce, but point to different determinants of nascent vs. new business ownership.…”
Section: Commonly Used Nation-level Indicators Of Entrepreneurship Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation of CEE and CIS countries with regard to business start-ups and especially NTBFs is somewhat special. Aidis, Estrin and Mickiewicz [Aidis et al, , 2012 point out the weak institutions in those countries and argue that the institutional environment is important in explaining the levels of entrepreneurship development. Moreover, they make an observation that freedom from corruption is significantly related to entrepreneurial entry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%