2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-021-03010-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size is not everything: differing activity and foraging patterns between the sexes in a monomorphic mammal

Abstract: Animals balance foraging with other activities, and activity patterns may differ between sexes due to differing physical requirements and reproductive investments. Sex-specific behavioural differences are common in sexually dimorphic mammals, but have received limited research attention in monomorphic mammals where the sexes are similar in body size. Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) are obligate monogamous and monomorphic mammals and a good model species to study sex-specific differences. As females increase en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(138 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies on semi-aquatic mammals show how males and females in two species of shrew (Neomys fodiens and Sorex coronatus) use separate foraging habitats during the breeding season [165]. Males and females in our population have been shown to differ seasonally in aquatic foraging with peaks in the spring and late summer for females, whereas males only foraged on aquatic vegetation in the spring [166]. We found that selection for the focal plant species were statistically stronger among subordinate individuals, which may be linked to their higher energetic requirements resulting from their activities related to attempts to become dominant in a territory [57] (e.g.…”
Section: Diving Selectionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Other studies on semi-aquatic mammals show how males and females in two species of shrew (Neomys fodiens and Sorex coronatus) use separate foraging habitats during the breeding season [165]. Males and females in our population have been shown to differ seasonally in aquatic foraging with peaks in the spring and late summer for females, whereas males only foraged on aquatic vegetation in the spring [166]. We found that selection for the focal plant species were statistically stronger among subordinate individuals, which may be linked to their higher energetic requirements resulting from their activities related to attempts to become dominant in a territory [57] (e.g.…”
Section: Diving Selectionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The low activity levels can also be due to the fact that female lorises park their infants and stay in proximity to their infants during the first months of life to return to visit the infant during foraging periods [56]. We did not include reproductive periods in the model as births in Javan slow loris are aseasonal, but reproductive state may have played an important role in shaping activity levels since females were either on gestation or lactation periods during the data collection [29,57]. Behavioral observations indicate that females tend to have a higher consumption of crude proteins, fruits, gum, and flowers during gestation and lactation than males [41], and they tend to have higher feeding time than males [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activity patterns can also differ between sexes, with females that can have either lower or higher energy intakes/costs than males during lactations and gestations [28]. The choice of either maximizing energy intake or minimizing energy expenditure depends on species and environmental conditions [29,30]. There are, however, cases when the activity patterns of females do not differ from those of males, even during periods of high energy needs (e.g., [31]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original analysis fit a GAMM with a logit link to flexibly model seasonal trends in foraging behavior while accounting for repeated measurements (Lodberg-Holm et al, 2021). By including beaver-level intercepts, this approach yielded inference for "beaver-specific" associations.…”
Section: Seasonality In Beaver Foraging Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%