2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size influence on shape of handwritten characters loops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How letters are formed may be influenced by other factors such as the speed at which they were written (Halder-Sinn & Funsch, 1998), the preceding letter (Graham & Weintraub, 1996) and the size of the writing (Marquis, Taroni, Bozza, & Schmittbuhl, 2007). As children become older, a personal handwriting style usually develops which is different to the convention they were taught as beginner writers (Hamstra-Bletz & Blote, 1990;Ziviani & Wallen, 2006).…”
Section: Letter Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How letters are formed may be influenced by other factors such as the speed at which they were written (Halder-Sinn & Funsch, 1998), the preceding letter (Graham & Weintraub, 1996) and the size of the writing (Marquis, Taroni, Bozza, & Schmittbuhl, 2007). As children become older, a personal handwriting style usually develops which is different to the convention they were taught as beginner writers (Hamstra-Bletz & Blote, 1990;Ziviani & Wallen, 2006).…”
Section: Letter Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may have reduced the need for multi-finger coordination, which is a requirement of handwriting (Dooijes, 1983). Third, although there is evidence of end-effector independence in handwriting, when writing relatively large letters their shapes are altered (Marquis, Taroni, Bozza, & Schmittbuhl, 2007), and the need for position accuracy is also reduced.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still in this measurement quest more than one research favoured the statistical study of features mainly associated with the shape of the letterstherefore focusing on "morphology", intended here in its etymology of 'related to the shape (the contour or outline) of the object' [5,6]. This shape-dependent approach entails the risk that when fortuitous or transient morphological changes occur in the signature, the mathematical ('graphometrical') data previously collected and classified as characteristic of that specific writer can accordingly result modified [7], consequently increasing the chances of an incorrect opinion being released as to the signatory. By way of an example one can think of the substantial changes in the shape of ovals ("a", "o", etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%