1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.53.2167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-induced structural transitions in the Cu-O and Ce-O systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
87
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
13
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the erroneous impact of the support (especially reducible metal oxides like ceria or zirconia, and partly ZnO) on the quantification of dispersion and passivation extent, we refer to Bartley et al [27]. Concerning the stability of Cu 2 O phases, Palkar et al [39] report that cubic Cu 2 O is more stable than monoclinic CuO at small crystallite sizes ( < 25 nm). This is related to the increasing ionic character of solids with decreasing particle size and is also dependent on calcination conditions.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the erroneous impact of the support (especially reducible metal oxides like ceria or zirconia, and partly ZnO) on the quantification of dispersion and passivation extent, we refer to Bartley et al [27]. Concerning the stability of Cu 2 O phases, Palkar et al [39] report that cubic Cu 2 O is more stable than monoclinic CuO at small crystallite sizes ( < 25 nm). This is related to the increasing ionic character of solids with decreasing particle size and is also dependent on calcination conditions.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently, it was confirmed that Cu 2 O nanoparticles can be uniformly dispersed in the matrix, irrespective of initial amount of deposited Cu. Palkar et al has reported that a decrease in particle size (below 25 nm) is to favor the Cu 2 O phase over CuO due to increase in ionic character with decreasing particle size [18]. It seems thus likely that the particles in the present study are Cu 2 O (not CuO) because the particle size is almost below 10 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…At 80 W, when the annealing time was increased from 5 to 15 minutes with an effluent temperature increased from 288 to 349°C (Table 1), the conversion of CuO into Cu 2 O increased. The previous study also demonstrated that Cu nanoparticles could be converted into Cu 2 O at a low temperature of 250°C [38]. However, the weak CuO peaks in the XRD patterns that were still found after modification for 15 min at either 60 W or 80 W should be caused by the thick CuO film (about 15 μm) that was prepared by the former thermal oxidation process, and led to no signal of Cu substrate (thickness of 1 mm) that can be identified.…”
Section: Cu 2 O Nanowires Produced By Rf Plasma Reductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…By the thermal method, the decomposition of CuO to Cu 2 O is difficult and needs to be conducted in an environment above 1100°C [37,38]. Hence, the CuO nanowires prepared at 500°C were reduced into Cu 2 O by reacting with N-containing energetic species produced by the RF plasma at a relatively low temperature (<350°C) with a short reaction time (5-15 min).…”
Section: Cu 2 O Nanowires Produced By Rf Plasma Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation