2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14081945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-Induced Constraint Effects on Crack Initiation and Propagation Parameters in Ductile Polymers

Abstract: Fracture mechanics are of high interest for the engineering design and structural integrity assessment of polymeric materials; however, regarding highly ductile polymers, many open questions still remain in terms of fully understanding deformation and fracture behaviors. For example, the influence of the constraint and specimen size on the fracture behavior of polymeric materials is still not clear. In this study, a polymeric material with an elastic plastic deformation behavior (ABS, acrylonitrile butadiene s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The points where the blunting process was completed for each system were analyzed by the LS method (0.9975* S sb,max = S sb,lim ) and marked as filled circles in Figure 8B. Note that the positions, u pl,lim as defined by the LS method were preceded before the load values reached a maximum, which is consistent with the observations made by others 33,34 . Even though J I,lim is somewhat size‐dependent, varying for different specimen thickness and initial crack length, it can still assess material's fracture toughness effectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The points where the blunting process was completed for each system were analyzed by the LS method (0.9975* S sb,max = S sb,lim ) and marked as filled circles in Figure 8B. Note that the positions, u pl,lim as defined by the LS method were preceded before the load values reached a maximum, which is consistent with the observations made by others 33,34 . Even though J I,lim is somewhat size‐dependent, varying for different specimen thickness and initial crack length, it can still assess material's fracture toughness effectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Note that the positions, u pl,lim as defined by the LS method were preceded before the load values reached a maximum, which is consistent with the observations made by others. 33,34 Even though J I,lim is somewhat sizedependent, varying for different specimen thickness and initial crack length, it can still assess material's fracture toughness effectively. As shown in Table 5, the trend of the SEBS contain significant filler agglomerations, which act as defects to lower their fracture toughness.…”
Section: Fracture Toughness Determined By the Ls Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%