HPLC of Polymers 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-58265-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Exclusion Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M n values determined from the GPC data were consistently the lowest. Several factors must be considered when explaining differences observed for the techniques including the following: (1) accurate quantitation by MS analysis of the low-mass tails of the 10−40 ku samples, (2) accurate integration of the methyl end group region for 1 H NMR analysis, and (3) accurate M n determination biased by end group variation and limited by apparent polystyrene mass calibration for GPC analysis. Currently, we are investigating an approach to better evaluate uncertainties associated with the three techniques in order to make reliable comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M n values determined from the GPC data were consistently the lowest. Several factors must be considered when explaining differences observed for the techniques including the following: (1) accurate quantitation by MS analysis of the low-mass tails of the 10−40 ku samples, (2) accurate integration of the methyl end group region for 1 H NMR analysis, and (3) accurate M n determination biased by end group variation and limited by apparent polystyrene mass calibration for GPC analysis. Currently, we are investigating an approach to better evaluate uncertainties associated with the three techniques in order to make reliable comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%