2009
DOI: 10.1088/1748-3182/4/1/015002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effects on insect hovering aerodynamics: an integrated computational study

Abstract: Hovering is a miracle of insects that is observed for all sizes of flying insects. Sizing effect in insect hovering on flapping-wing aerodynamics is of interest to both the micro-air-vehicle (MAV) community and also of importance to comparative morphologists. In this study, we present an integrated computational study of such size effects on insect hovering aerodynamics, which is performed using a biology-inspired dynamic flight simulator that integrates the modelling of realistic wing-body morphology, the mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
120
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(61 reference statements)
8
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As illustrated in figure 2c, both flexible and rigid wings show a similar high peak of vertical force immediately after the wing turns to decelerate. This is because the LEV keeps growing and attaching coherently onto the wing surface even after the LEV breaks down with the TV shedding off the wing surface [6,35]. However, there does exist pronounced discrepancy at early down-stroke, where the flexible wing obviously creates more vertical forces than the rigid wing (figure 2c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As illustrated in figure 2c, both flexible and rigid wings show a similar high peak of vertical force immediately after the wing turns to decelerate. This is because the LEV keeps growing and attaching coherently onto the wing surface even after the LEV breaks down with the TV shedding off the wing surface [6,35]. However, there does exist pronounced discrepancy at early down-stroke, where the flexible wing obviously creates more vertical forces than the rigid wing (figure 2c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the LEV and the TV play a key role in the force production of hovering flight, influence of the vortex structures near the body can be negligible [34]. An intense hovering downwash is formed flowing through the centre of the DVR [6,35]. However, there does exist pronounced discrepancy between the flexible and rigid wings: the direction of air-flow generated by the flexible wing approaches the vertical direction more than that of the rigid wing.…”
Section: (D) Wake Structures Induced By Flexible Wingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the scale of flow between each individual bristle, the continuum assumption for the fluid may introduce errors (Liu and Aono, 2009). The Knudsen number, Kn, gives a measure of the mean free path of a molecule over the characteristic length scale and is given by the equation:…”
Section: Possible Rarefied Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a diameter of 200 mm, the small sphere functioned as the wing block. The distance from its surface to the wing tip was 34.5 mm (or 2.8 times as much as C m ), which was larger than the 2C m value adopted in previous researches [19,25]. With a diameter of 650 mm, the large sphere functioned as the body block.…”
Section: Grid Generationmentioning
confidence: 76%