2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effects in foams: Experiments and modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
95
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
15
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods for calculating strain have been proposed in the literature but they are either limited for regular honeycombs (Zou et al, 2009) or based on small strain definition (Tekoglu et al, 2011). Zheng et al (2012) suggested that strain should be defined as statistical average measured over a range of at least one cell size because of the cellular nature of the materials.…”
Section: Local Strain Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods for calculating strain have been proposed in the literature but they are either limited for regular honeycombs (Zou et al, 2009) or based on small strain definition (Tekoglu et al, 2011). Zheng et al (2012) suggested that strain should be defined as statistical average measured over a range of at least one cell size because of the cellular nature of the materials.…”
Section: Local Strain Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, uniaxial compression tests are first conducted on cubic sample with the dimension of 40mm in three mutually perpendicular principal directions (shown in Figure 2) in order to characterize directional properties of this foam, which should be taken into consideration before investigating mechanical behavior. On the other hands, it is well-known that mechanical behavior of metallic foam is strongly sensitive to the ratio of the sample size to the cell size at length scales where the two are of the same order of magnitude (Bastawros et al, 2000;Onck et al, 2001;Andrews et al, 2001;Jeon and Asahina, 2005;Joseph et al, 2005;Rakow and Waas,2005;Tekoğlu and Onck, 2008;Caner and Bazant, 2009;Jeon et al, 2009;Tekoğlu et al, 2011;Su et al, 2014). Most researchers have adopted big size samples in the mechanical tests to avoid the size effect of cellular materials (McCullough et al, 1999;Ruan et al, 2002;Saha et al, 2005;Amsterdam et al, 2008;Lu et al, 2008;Shen et al, 2010;Mangipudi and Onck, 2011;Luong et al, 2013;Jin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Sample Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniaxial compression tests were conducted by controlling the constant vertical displacement rate of 0.02mm/s, corresponding to a nominal strain rate of 5.0 × 10 -4 s -1 . In the previous works, the ratio of samples size to cell size L/d was introduced to analyse the size effect in the mechanical behavior of metallic foam Tekoğlu et al, 2011;). For the sake of illustration convenience, the ratio of the sample length to cell size of L/d is also used in subsequent analysis.…”
Section: Sample Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, since 3-dimensional printing technology has emerged, an additive production method to build metallic structure by liquid metal has been proposed. It will be possible in the near future to make a foam structure by 3-D printer if one has the design of the foam [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%