2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effect on pull-in behavior of electrostatically actuated microbeams based on a modified couple stress theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regards, the non-classical theories such as non-local elasticity (Eringen and Edelen 1972), couple stress theory (Kong, 2013;Ejike, 1969), strain gradient theory (Lam et al, 2003), modified couple stress theory (Yang et al, 2002) etc. have been developed to consider the size effect in theoretical continuum models.…”
Section: Using Various Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regards, the non-classical theories such as non-local elasticity (Eringen and Edelen 1972), couple stress theory (Kong, 2013;Ejike, 1969), strain gradient theory (Lam et al, 2003), modified couple stress theory (Yang et al, 2002) etc. have been developed to consider the size effect in theoretical continuum models.…”
Section: Using Various Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most comprehensive work was done by Mindlin[14] which contained five additional material parameters and encompassed other non-local theories as special cases Non-local elasticity has been used to study buckling, bending vibration dislocation mechanics, fracture mechanics, surface tension fluids, etc. (Reddy, 2007;Mohammadi et al, 2012;2013;Moosavi et al, 2011;Danesh et al, 2012;Farajpour et al, 2012) Lam et al (2003, introduced a modified strain gradient theory with three material length scale parameters relevant to dilatation gradient, deviatoric gradient, and symmetric rotation gradient tensors. While some simple size dependent models based on modified couple stress theory have been applied to analyze the pull-in instability of MEMS/NEMS (Tadi HRokni, et al, 2013;Noghrehabadi et al, 2013;Zhang and Fu, 2012;Mindlin and Tiersten, 1962;Yin et al, 2011), only rare works have utilized strain gradient theory for analyzing.…”
Section: Using Various Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They introduced a non-classical model for the electrostatically actuated microbeam by using MCST with the Rayleigh-Ritz method. S. Kong [16] also showed that normalized pull-in voltage of the microbeam by the MCST is 3.1 times greater than that predicted by the CT when the microbeam thickness equals to the material length scale parameter. Askari et al [17] studied the size-dependent dynamic pull-in analysis of clamped-clamped microbeams under mechanical shock based on MCST.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A modified couple stress model first proposed by Yang et al [17] is adopted to capture micro-scale effects, using a symmetric couple stress tensor, and one material length scale parameter. These features make the modified couple stress model preferable for variational formulation of beam and plate theories [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%