2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3453-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size discrepancy between endoscopic size and pathologic size is not negligible in endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer

Abstract: Larger size, flat/depressed type, and undifferentiated histology of EGC carry a significant risk for endoscopic underestimation of lesion size, which results in the lower rates of complete and curative resections for EGC. Further studies to reduce size discrepancy are warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent evaluation of the endoscopic and the pathologic size, the median difference was 5 mm and the risk LGD low-grade dysplasia, HGD high-grade dysplasia, AI-EGC absolute indication early gastric cancer, EI-EGC expanded indication early gastric cancer, BEI-EGC beyond expanded indication early gastric cancer, ESD endoscopic submucosal dissection factors for size underestimation were larger lesion, flat/depressed type, and undifferentiated-type histology [10]. Determination of horizontal extent of the lesion is difficult for intestinal-type EGC in lesions with a flat component, large size, and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent evaluation of the endoscopic and the pathologic size, the median difference was 5 mm and the risk LGD low-grade dysplasia, HGD high-grade dysplasia, AI-EGC absolute indication early gastric cancer, EI-EGC expanded indication early gastric cancer, BEI-EGC beyond expanded indication early gastric cancer, ESD endoscopic submucosal dissection factors for size underestimation were larger lesion, flat/depressed type, and undifferentiated-type histology [10]. Determination of horizontal extent of the lesion is difficult for intestinal-type EGC in lesions with a flat component, large size, and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, the final histological diagnosis of 32-53 % of high-grade dysplasia is changed to gastric cancer after endoscopic resection [8,9]. Second, the lesion size measured before and after endoscopic resection may differ considerably [10]. Third, estimation of the depth of invasion before the treatment is not reliable, even after endoscopic ultrasonography [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative diagnoses are not always accurate. There are usually discrepancies between preoperative and postoperative tumor-size measurements, with tumor size often underestimated [13][14][15]. We limited the preoperative tumor size to less than 30 mm in diameter to satisfy the JCGA's curative resection criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor size was measured using both EGD and EUS. If lesion size was measured using both EGD and EUS, the larger measurement was recorded as the representative tumor size [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%