2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.06.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-dependent electromagnetic properties and the related simulations of Fe3O4 nanoparticles made by microwave-assisted thermal decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 1, all the nanoparticles of four different sizes were successfully modified without apparent agglomeration, where a thin layer of DSPE-PEG2000 was visible. The DLS data showed that the hydrodynamic diameters of the as-synthesized MION with different TEM sizes (14,18,22, and 26 nm) were 24, 28, 33, and 38 nm, respectively (Figure 2(a)). What is more, Fe 3 O 4 @PEG of the four sizes all exhibited excellent stability in aqueous Journal of Nanomaterials solution during a long period of time about 5 months (Figure 2(b)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 1, all the nanoparticles of four different sizes were successfully modified without apparent agglomeration, where a thin layer of DSPE-PEG2000 was visible. The DLS data showed that the hydrodynamic diameters of the as-synthesized MION with different TEM sizes (14,18,22, and 26 nm) were 24, 28, 33, and 38 nm, respectively (Figure 2(a)). What is more, Fe 3 O 4 @PEG of the four sizes all exhibited excellent stability in aqueous Journal of Nanomaterials solution during a long period of time about 5 months (Figure 2(b)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The saturation magnetization (M s ) of Fe 3 O 4 @PEG increased with size, and the hysteresis loop exhibited superparamagnetic behavior (Figure 2(c)). The M s of the four sizes (14,18,22, and 26 nm) was 78, 88, 92, and 97 emu g −1 Fe at room temperature (300 K), respectively. It was worth mentioning that the M s tended to have impact on magnetic heating and MRI contrast effect of MION [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fe 3 O 4 , being the most widely studied photocatalyst among the ferrite nanoparticles, displays exceptional superparamagnetic behavior, which provides an additional benefit of a much easier magnetic separation of the semiconductor and the solution. The preparation of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles is commonly done by coprecipitation method [13,31,63,79] or thermal decomposition method [95][96][97][98], with slight variations such as the room temperature coprecipitation by Mascolo and sonochemical preparation by Solomon [13,26,99]. Moreover, different variations in the morphologies of ferritic nanoparticles are shown in figures 6(a) and (b), which show the SEM images of hollow Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles [100] and a complex core-shell nanocomposite of Fe 3 O 4 @ SiO 2 @ Poly (ethyleneimine)-Au/Ag @ Polydopamine [101].…”
Section: Nanocomposites and Heterojunctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific absorption rate, often denominated as heating efficiency, is directly related to the heat losses of the MNPs when exposed to the AC field, and it is given by the hysteresis loop area of the MNPs [32]. Therefore, the SAR should be improved by increasing the area of the AC hysteresis loop, which is essentially proportional to the saturation magnetization (Ms) and the coercive field (Hc) of the with each field oscillation) and single domain particle hysteresis effect [32,34]. In these aspects, the size of the particles embedded in our films, as calculated by SAXS measurements (Table 2), is well in the range of those that give the enhanced SAR.…”
Section: Small-angle X-ray Scattering (Saxsmentioning
confidence: 99%