2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-019-0855-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-density trajectories for even-aged sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands revealing similarities and differences in the mortality process

Abstract: & Key message We studied the size-density trajectories of pure even-aged unthinned experimental sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) stands in the ranges of 994-135,555 trees per hectare initial densities, observed from the ages of 5 to 38. We compared them to unthinned beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands from the same experimental area. An original piecewise polynomial function was fitted to the trajectories, giving way to various applications. For each species, the initial number of trees per hectare (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend of a horizontal line followed by a descending line, in log-log scales, is reported for common beach stands [38], Chinese fir plantations [39], and even-aged sessile oak [40], among others. References [39] and [40] divide the full trajectory into three stages, where the second stage corresponds to a concave trajectory, and the third corresponds to a self-thinning line, describing a maximum size-density relationship that involves maximum allowable stand density for a given mean diameter.…”
Section: Size-density Trajectory and Self-thinning Linesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A similar trend of a horizontal line followed by a descending line, in log-log scales, is reported for common beach stands [38], Chinese fir plantations [39], and even-aged sessile oak [40], among others. References [39] and [40] divide the full trajectory into three stages, where the second stage corresponds to a concave trajectory, and the third corresponds to a self-thinning line, describing a maximum size-density relationship that involves maximum allowable stand density for a given mean diameter.…”
Section: Size-density Trajectory and Self-thinning Linesupporting
confidence: 78%