2021
DOI: 10.4314/vulnew.v79i.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size cline not subspeciation in the Hooded Vulture

Abstract: Wing, tail and bill lengths of Hooded Vultures were measured on 36 wild-caught birds and 75 in museum collections. A further 60 measurements were taken from literature, and 40 measurements were received from the Musée royal de l’Afrique centrale (Tervuren, Belgium). By grouping them into regions of Africa it was shown that the smallest birds were in West Africa and the largest in southern Africa (which is well known), with a gradation in between. Sizes varied according to a cline, and were correlated with aver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent work supports the widely held opinion past and present that N. monachus is monotypic. This is based on the homogeneity of a wide-ranging set of morphometric measurements and a constancy of plumage characteristics across the entire range (Barlow et al 2020, Mundy 2020. These studies conclude that detectable variation in size (particularly wing length) across the western, eastern and southern populations is clinal and that the recognition of N. m. pileatus cannot be justified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, recent work supports the widely held opinion past and present that N. monachus is monotypic. This is based on the homogeneity of a wide-ranging set of morphometric measurements and a constancy of plumage characteristics across the entire range (Barlow et al 2020, Mundy 2020. These studies conclude that detectable variation in size (particularly wing length) across the western, eastern and southern populations is clinal and that the recognition of N. m. pileatus cannot be justified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%