2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-based separation methods of circulating tumor cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
124
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 197 publications
3
124
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several filter-based systems for capturing CTCs. [50][51][52] We did not directly compare the performance between the MCA system and other filter-based methods but preclinical and clinical data support that the MCA system is comparable to other systems and it may have an advantage over others in NSCLC. It was previously shown that in spike-in experiments MCA system could recover more than 80% of various lung cancer cell lines with the mean size of 12.5 μm and more including high VM-expressing cell lines, such as PC-14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several filter-based systems for capturing CTCs. [50][51][52] We did not directly compare the performance between the MCA system and other filter-based methods but preclinical and clinical data support that the MCA system is comparable to other systems and it may have an advantage over others in NSCLC. It was previously shown that in spike-in experiments MCA system could recover more than 80% of various lung cancer cell lines with the mean size of 12.5 μm and more including high VM-expressing cell lines, such as PC-14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there have been commercially available reagents and platforms based on the above different principles for separating GC-and CRC-CTCs, including density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll-Pauqe R ; OncoQuick R ; RosetteSep R CTC), microfiltration (ScreenCell R ; ISET R ), inertial focusing (Vortex R ), and electrophoresis (DEPArray R ) (41). The most common biophysical CTCs enrichment technology is size-based microfiltration, which assumes that CTCs can be isolated from blood cells due to their larger volume and more rigid shape, and this technology has been improved by the introduction of nano to micron-sized filter pores (42). Currently, new lab-on-a-chip microfluidics devices have gradually appeared and significantly improved the GC-and CRC-CTCs yields compared with the conventional membrane microfiltration and EpCAM-based immunoaffinity assays (43,44).…”
Section: Biophysical Property-based Technologies Of Ctcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Cultures of patient-derived CTCs can be most helpful for drug-resistance detection, and make it possible for personalized anticancer-agent screening ( Figure 2). 10,13 Figure 1 Timeline of PubMed entries. Notes: Search criteria included "nanotechnology" AND "CTCs", "nano" AND "CTCs", and "nano" AND "circulating tumor cells" to determine number of publications (columns).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…126 This technology has become mainstream in CTC enrichment and detection, due to its cost-effectiveness, miniaturization, and improvement in efficiency, since it can be integrated into other techniques. 13,127 The development of the majority of current microchip platforms is based on magnetic force, affinity, size, or other physical properties. 128 Two types of microfluidic devices are used for CTC detection: the immunomagnetic-based method for CTC detection (eg, CTC chip), and antibody labeling combined with physical isolation (Figure 5), which can consist of different materials like silicon, glass, or thermopolymer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%