The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.102.184426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size- and temperature-dependent magnetization of iron nanoclusters

Abstract: The magnetic behavior of bcc iron nanoclusters, with diameters between 2 and 8 nm, is investigated by means of spin dynamics simulations coupled to molecular dynamics, using a distance-dependent exchange interaction. Finite-size effects in the total magnetization as well as the influence of the free surface and the surface/core proportion of the nanoclusters are analyzed in detail for a wide temperature range, going beyond the cluster and bulk Curie temperatures. Comparison is made with experimental data and w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(148 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By removing the periodicity of the system, different Curie temperatures can be observed between the static and dynamic lattice case, due to the surface effects that induce a variation of the effective exchange constant in the order of 10%. Santos et al 59 have performed a systematic comparison of the finite size effects of the magnetisation of static and dynamic lattice calculation and their results showed differences between the two even in the case of periodic systems. This suggests that the individual parameterisation of the exchange and inter-atomic potential can largely influence the behaviour of the equilibrium magnetisation.…”
Section: Spin-lattice Thermalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By removing the periodicity of the system, different Curie temperatures can be observed between the static and dynamic lattice case, due to the surface effects that induce a variation of the effective exchange constant in the order of 10%. Santos et al 59 have performed a systematic comparison of the finite size effects of the magnetisation of static and dynamic lattice calculation and their results showed differences between the two even in the case of periodic systems. This suggests that the individual parameterisation of the exchange and inter-atomic potential can largely influence the behaviour of the equilibrium magnetisation.…”
Section: Spin-lattice Thermalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have been investigating the relevance of the NĂ©el model to simulate surface effects in 3-d magnetic metals 52,53 . Future work could leverage our framework to develop surface interaction models for spinlattice simulations of magnetic nanoparticles 54 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here SLD simulations may prove useful. This technique has been used to study magnetism in Fe nanoparticles, the effect of vacancies on spin waves, the influence of magnetism on phase transitions, and other phenomena [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%