1994
DOI: 10.1109/20.305742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size and stiffness measurements on 9.5 m long LHC dipole coils

Abstract: Coil InnerRadius m Inner 25.0 Outer 42.8 Size and Stiffness Measurements on 9.5 m long LHC Dipole Coils OuterRadius StraightLength Overallhgth mm mm mn 42.3 9060 9512 60.2 9132 9512Abstruct -For a 10 m long superconducting dipole prototype magnet for CERN's LHC program in total 17 dummy and superconducting coils were manufactured at ELIN company. The paper presents measurements taken during coil manufacturing. The results are compared to results obtained on models. The influence of cable dimensions on the fina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already observed for other film-insulated superconducting cables [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], the coil features a strong stress-dependent rigidity and a stress-displacement curve characterised by a relevant mechanical hysteresis during the loading-unloading compression cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…As already observed for other film-insulated superconducting cables [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], the coil features a strong stress-dependent rigidity and a stress-displacement curve characterised by a relevant mechanical hysteresis during the loading-unloading compression cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…No significant difference is found between the case of the full stack and of the stack with aluminum, whose stress losses differ by less than 10 MPa. A decrease in the thermal contraction coefficient of around 0.002 is found for the cavity with invar, where the stress loss is reduced by [15][16][17][18][19][20] MPa. This decrease is approximately constant for the five considered cases, leading to an offset between the two -curves.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the unloading phase is considerably different from the loading one and varies according to the maximum load reached in the compression phase (mechanical hysteresis). As the superconducting coil is subjected to a loading-unloading cycle during magnet assembly, the final state of the coil at room temperature and its dimension [17], [18] is determined not only by its stress-strain relation, but also by the cycle used during the magnet assembly process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%