2013
DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2012.675329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size and Local Democracy: the Case of Czech Municipal Representatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…From the perspective of education, small student societies provide opportunities for students to develop political self, affiliation to particular fields and access to cultural and social capital (Loader et al 2015). Meanwhile, political science research provides both theoretical and empirical evidences that small communities promote opportunities for participation in democracy (see Dahl and Tufte 1973, Ryšavý and Bernard 2013, Erk and Veenendaal 2014cited in Kouba 2018. Specifically, the social sanctions and norms in small communities create more pressure and incentives, which effectively builds up shared social identity and motivate voting and participation behaviours of the students (Knack 1992;Funk 2010;Kouba 2018;Bolden et al 2014).…”
Section: Student Union and Societiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of education, small student societies provide opportunities for students to develop political self, affiliation to particular fields and access to cultural and social capital (Loader et al 2015). Meanwhile, political science research provides both theoretical and empirical evidences that small communities promote opportunities for participation in democracy (see Dahl and Tufte 1973, Ryšavý and Bernard 2013, Erk and Veenendaal 2014cited in Kouba 2018. Specifically, the social sanctions and norms in small communities create more pressure and incentives, which effectively builds up shared social identity and motivate voting and participation behaviours of the students (Knack 1992;Funk 2010;Kouba 2018;Bolden et al 2014).…”
Section: Student Union and Societiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, most studies in the Czech Republic confirmed that municipality size has a significant influence, for instance, on voter turnout as one of the indicators of citizen participation in local politics (Kostelecký, 2005;Ryšavý and Bernard, 2013). In spite of the existence of contrary results by Magin (2013), the assumption that larger municipalities are more promising to women's representation was confirmed by most of the few studies analysing local elections (Welch and Karnig, 1979;Bullock and MacManus, 1991;Trounstine and Valdini, 2008;Smith, Reingold and Owens, 2012).…”
Section: Determinants Of Women's Representation At the Local Levelmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Dahl, Tu e 1973;Mouritzen 1989;Larsen 2002;Lassen, Serritzlew 2011;v Česku např. Hampl, Müller 1998;Ryšavý, Bernard 2013).…”
Section: úVodunclassified
“…třeba sledovat obce z hlediska efektivnosti (cena zajišťovaných služeb), lokální demokracie (souvislost mezi velikostí obce a participací občanů či vykazatelností³ místních vlád), distributivní spravedlnosti (spravedlivé rozdělení daňové zátěže obyvatel v kontextu služeb obcemi poskytovanými) a rozvoje obce (očekávání spojená s ekonomickým rozvojem obce dle její velikosti; . Ryšavý, Bernard (2013) ukázali na nevýhodu fungování lokální demokracie v Česku. Upozornili na problematiku malých obcí, kde mají stávající držitelé volených pozic výrazně vyšší šanci být znovuzvoleni do zastupitelstva v komunálních volbách než ve větších obcích a jsou tedy v menší míře voliči činěni zodpovědnými za své předchozí působení.…”
Section: Teoretická Východiskaunclassified