2008
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arn041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size and heterozygosity influence partner selection in the Formosan subterranean termite

Abstract: In monogamous species that exhibit extensive biparental investment, such as termites, both sexes are predicted to be selective when choosing a mate. Size-related traits are expected to be important in partner selection because the fat reserves of the colony founders sustain the incipient colony. Partner relatedness and heterozygosity determine the degree of inbreeding and genetic diversity within the colony and may thus also influence partner selection. To test these predictions, we investigated whether phenot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Limited information exists on the influence of heterozygosity on pairing status in monogamous species. However, paired females were found to be more heterozygous than single females in the Formosan subterranean termite (Coptotermes formosanus), while there was no difference in heterozygosity between paired and single males (Husseneder and Simms 2008). The weak effect observed in the present study might be due to a relatively small sample size for unpaired females (n=16).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Limited information exists on the influence of heterozygosity on pairing status in monogamous species. However, paired females were found to be more heterozygous than single females in the Formosan subterranean termite (Coptotermes formosanus), while there was no difference in heterozygosity between paired and single males (Husseneder and Simms 2008). The weak effect observed in the present study might be due to a relatively small sample size for unpaired females (n=16).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…We first used GLMs to analyze the relationship between wing chord and tarsus length, as well as the relationship between each morphometric variable and MLH, using each time sex as covariate (Husseneder and Simms 2008;Shaner et al 2013). We then used logistic regressions to test for the effects of tarsus length, wing chord and MLH, and those of all the interactions between these three variables, on social status (coded as a binomial variable, i.e.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, more and more experimental evidence suggests that the pairing of males and females is controlled rather than random and mates are chosen based on numerous criteria, such as partner relatedness (Shellman-Reeve 2001), size and body mass (Shellman-Reeve 1999; , and level of heterozygosity (Husseneder and Simms 2008).…”
Section: Mate Attraction and Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most studies have focused on morphological and behavioural traits [1], evidence is accruing for multiple genetic criteria for mate choice [2,3]. Females may choose males with 'good genes', such as those with alleles or allele combinations increasing fitness [4,5] or with high heterozygosity [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%