2017
DOI: 10.1111/coa.12881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sixty‐three patient‐based survey—Can Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test‐22 be a suitable evaluation method for septoplasty and turbinectomy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However recent publication suggest that it is also a validated outcome that can measure the improvement of patient's symptoms post Nasal Obstruction and sinus Surgical procedures, as septoplasty, turbinoplasty [2], and endoscopic sinsus surgery [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However recent publication suggest that it is also a validated outcome that can measure the improvement of patient's symptoms post Nasal Obstruction and sinus Surgical procedures, as septoplasty, turbinoplasty [2], and endoscopic sinsus surgery [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional tools, such as SNOT-22 [17], also demonstrate utility in evaluating the patient-centred outcomes of nasal obstruction and septoplasty [18]. Other subjective tools, including the Glasgow Benefit Index have demonstrated improvement following septoplasty [19], and objective measures, including acoustic rhinometry are effective in evaluating septoplasty outcomes [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) is a widely applied patient‐reported outcome instrument used to assess the severity of symptoms associated with different nose conditions. It is a validated questionnaire of disease‐specific, quality‐of‐life related measures of sinonasal function (see Hopkins et al, Kordjian and Schousboe, and De los Santos et al for further details). Preoperative and postoperative scores were recorded from the patients (see below).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%