Sixth Method as a Simplified Measurement for SMEs?

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in Abstract:In December 2014, OECD issued a Discussion Draft on Transfer Pricing aspects of cross-border commodity transactions through BEPS action 10, where the adoption of the sixth method in the form of the quoted commodity price and its adjustments were primarily driven as a starting point for transfer pricing purpose. In this paper the analysis of the proposed sixth method and the experience with the sixth method in Argentina were used for the consideration whether this method can be used as simplified measurement for SMEs. SMEs are facing tax obstacles mainly in the area of the international taxation which impede in cross border transactions and internationalization of SMEs. One of tax obstacles represent transfer pricing. Its costs can be disproportionately large for SMEs in comparison to LSEs. Moreover, SMEs are not able to bear the high administrative burden to comply with the transfer pricing rules as they do not posses the sufficient human and economic capital. Based on the results of the research, we can concluded, that there are a lot of questions related to the proposed sixth method, notwitstanding, it has a potential to be a new method for SMEs for they need to face lower tax administrative burden in the area of transfer pricing issues.

Global Absolute Poverty: The Beginning of the End?

“…The OECD guidelines accept five standard methods which all rely on an assessment of facts and circumstances of the individual transaction to determine the final price that should correspond to comparable market transaction. Conducting such a comparability analysis requires considerable technical capacity and expertise, something that is often lacking in resource-constrained low-income countries (Solilová and Nerudová 2015). Even where this capacity is available and sophisticated techniques for adjusting data from other regions for use as comparators are deployed, it produces a wide range of putative comparables at best (e.g., Gonnet et al 2014).…”

Education Access and "Learning Poverty" in Seven Southern African Countries

“…The OECD guidelines accept five standard methods which all rely on an assessment of facts and circumstances of the individual transaction to determine the final price that should correspond to comparable market transaction. Conducting such a comparability analysis requires considerable technical capacity and expertise, something that is often lacking in resource-constrained low-income countries (Solilová and Nerudová 2015). Even where this capacity is available and sophisticated techniques for adjusting data from other regions for use as comparators are deployed, it produces a wide range of putative comparables at best (e.g., Gonnet et al 2014).…”

Transitioning to No Poverty

“…The OECD guidelines accept five standard methods which all rely on an assessment of facts and circumstances of the individual transaction to determine the final price that should correspond to comparable market transaction. Conducting such a comparability analysis requires considerable technical capacity and expertise, something that is often lacking in resource-constrained low-income countries (Solilová and Nerudová 2015). Even where this capacity is available and sophisticated techniques for adjusting data from other regions for use as comparators are deployed, it produces a wide range of putative comparables at best (e.g., Gonnet et al 2014).…”