2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-010-9239-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sixth-Grade Students’ Views of the Nature of Engineering and Images of Engineers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
93
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
10
93
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The former differs from what was found in previous PATT studies (Dakers and de Vries 2009) for lower secondary and primary pupils, and for technology instead of engineering. Our results also suggest a more rich concept of engineering than was found among younger children (Karatas et al 2010;Knight and Cunningham 2004). That is a favorable outcome for developing engineering-related activities in upper secondary education, as it seems that there is a certain foundation already onto which can be built further.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The former differs from what was found in previous PATT studies (Dakers and de Vries 2009) for lower secondary and primary pupils, and for technology instead of engineering. Our results also suggest a more rich concept of engineering than was found among younger children (Karatas et al 2010;Knight and Cunningham 2004). That is a favorable outcome for developing engineering-related activities in upper secondary education, as it seems that there is a certain foundation already onto which can be built further.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…They found that engineering was mostly associated with designing. Karatas, Mickos and Bodner did a study among grade six students in the USA and found that for that age level the students' images of engineering were 'fragile, or unstable' (Karatas et al 2010). Evidently, not much is known yet about what senior secondary school children think about engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DAS and DAE require students to draw a scientist or engineer at work, and often ask the students to describe what they have drawn. Because students often confuse engineers with other occupations, such as scientists (Karatas, Micklos, & Bodner, 2011), it is expected that parallels can be drawn between the two.…”
Section: K-12 Student Perceptions Of Scientists and Engineersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Fralick et al (2009) reported that only 13% of the 1600 participating students drew female engineers. Similarly, in a study of 20 sixthgrade students conducted by Karatas et al (2011), only one student drew a female when asked to draw an engineer at work. Knight and Cunningham (2004) reported higher percentages of DAE images that portrayed females in their drawings (39%); however, most of these drawings came from a classroom where two female engineering college students worked with the children.…”
Section: K-12 Student Perceptions Of Scientists and Engineersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Similar problems plague engineering education, as many teachers and students do not understand what engineering is and often confuse the work of engineers with the work of scientists, construction workers, or mechanics. [19][20][21][22] Many elementary teachers may need help in recognizing and understanding the role of engineering in the world around them. 23 Elementary STEM education and early-aged engineering career awareness are increasingly considered as important components to meeting the demand for pre-college preparedness and increased engineering workforce diversity.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%