2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2019.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Six sigma robust design optimization for thermal protection system of hypersonic vehicles based on successive response surface method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SSP is deemed the best integration step for reliability to boost the optimal level of the SPO technique by improving the ribs' size for the triangular duct. So, this step includes finding the total chances of the ribs getting taller, reducing these chances using Central Composite Design (CCD), analyzing the results using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), and finally making the design better [89][90][91]. As depicted in Figure 11, the steps of the SSP path were followed depending on the proposed heights over 30 mm to enhance the vortices at the test section [92][93][94].…”
Section: Outcomes Of Investigation Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSP is deemed the best integration step for reliability to boost the optimal level of the SPO technique by improving the ribs' size for the triangular duct. So, this step includes finding the total chances of the ribs getting taller, reducing these chances using Central Composite Design (CCD), analyzing the results using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), and finally making the design better [89][90][91]. As depicted in Figure 11, the steps of the SSP path were followed depending on the proposed heights over 30 mm to enhance the vortices at the test section [92][93][94].…”
Section: Outcomes Of Investigation Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the convex model, based on interval mathematics, can serve as a powerful supplement to this part [29]. In order to predict the bounds of the response, some methods have been developed, such as the perturbation method [30], Taylor expansion method and gradient method [31], and response surface method [32]. Using the vertex method (VM), the exact solution will be obtained if the monotonicity of the function is guaranteed [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procedures for robust design have been investigated in the literature. For example, Response Surface Methodology was incorporated with the compromise Decision Support Problem 2 . Robust design methods such as the Taguchi design method are widely used and involve evaluating the parameters to be designed, designing the parameters using an orthogonal array, and performing analysis of variance using ANOVA and signal to noise ratios 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%