2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Six-month outcomes of teduglutide treatment in adult patients with short bowel syndrome with chronic intestinal failure: A real-world French observational cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
59
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
12
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An accurate title or abstract revision was sufficient to exclude 401 articles as not pertinent or not fulfilling our prespecified inclusion or exclusion criteria. The remaining 34 studies were assessed in full-text for eligibility; 10 of them finally met all criteria for being included in the final analysis [27,28,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]; 2 additional post hoc analyses were employed for data extraction [35,37], as they contained additional and relevant information for the assessment of the outcomes of 3 among the 10 pertinent papers [28,45,49]. The process of study selection is summarized in Figure 1.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accurate title or abstract revision was sufficient to exclude 401 articles as not pertinent or not fulfilling our prespecified inclusion or exclusion criteria. The remaining 34 studies were assessed in full-text for eligibility; 10 of them finally met all criteria for being included in the final analysis [27,28,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]; 2 additional post hoc analyses were employed for data extraction [35,37], as they contained additional and relevant information for the assessment of the outcomes of 3 among the 10 pertinent papers [28,45,49]. The process of study selection is summarized in Figure 1.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teduglutide enhances post-resection intestinal adaptation in SBS by stimulating intestinal mucosal growth and slowing gastrointestinal transit time, thus increasing intestinal absorption and decreasing intestinal losses in patients with SBS [14e18]. The response to treatment with teduglutide, with the consequent reduction in IVS requirements, has been shown to be greater in SBS-IF with the highest baseline IVS volume requirement [19,20] and in those with SBS-J [19]. Furthermore, the decision to use teduglutide in SBS-IF due to CD, the main cause of SBS-J in the present study, must take into account associated therapeutic precautions related to the presence of active disease, fistulas, strictures and the concomitant use biologic drugs [5,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights the need for patient-centred care, involving clinicians taking time to understand what is important to a particular patient and their goals [39]. As tedglutide has moved from being used in clinical trials to the real life setting patientcentred care and shared decision making to start the treatment are vital [40,41], not least because patients may have unachievable expectations which need discussing before they embark on a therapy. In addition, patients did not find it a straight forward decision and need to balance their preferences against the risks of the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%