2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-2109(01)00045-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Six hundred consecutive carotid endarterectomies with temporary shunt and vein patch angioplasty: early and long-term results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are consistent with recent studies of Ͼ500 carotid endarterectomies that demonstrate 30-day major stroke and death rates ranging from 0.9% to 4% and a restenosis rate of 0.7% to 7.9% over an average of 3.5 years (Table 2). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The present study demonstrating a 0.1% critical restenosis rate provides the longest follow-up data available to date and confirms that carotid endarterectomy is an extremely durable operation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These data are consistent with recent studies of Ͼ500 carotid endarterectomies that demonstrate 30-day major stroke and death rates ranging from 0.9% to 4% and a restenosis rate of 0.7% to 7.9% over an average of 3.5 years (Table 2). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The present study demonstrating a 0.1% critical restenosis rate provides the longest follow-up data available to date and confirms that carotid endarterectomy is an extremely durable operation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The preponderance of data indicates that restenosis rates are generally lower with patch closure of the arteriotomy than with primary closure, ranging from 0.1% to 5.8% and 1% to 14%, respectively. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 However, other studies with at least one-third of the patients operated on for an asymptomatic stenosis demonstrated far better survival with 92% to 93% at 5 years and 87% to 89% at 10 years. 5,7 Long-term survival in the randomized trials is not yet available, in ACAS mean follow-up was 2.6 years and in ACST there is an ongoing long-term follow-up. 1,2 These awaited results will probably provide further information on this matter, including the stroke-free survival, which was not possible to assess in this study, because stroke Ͼ30 days after surgery is not reported to the Swedvasc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2] Long-term follow-up after CEA for asymptomatic stenosis is not well-documented, 3-4 most reports have not analyzed outcome selectively for different indications. [5][6][7] Some natural history studies of patients with asymptomatic stenosis present risk factors, stroke and survival rates beyond 5 years, but differ in selection of study groups. 8 -10 The patients included in the majority of these studies often have a mean age of Ϸ70 years, and although the durability of CEA is good, the overall long-term mortality is also essential in decision-making for this prophylactic procedure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%