ince World War II, the work done by interstate organizations has created a shift in social imaginaries with regard to the relation between education, work, and the socioeconomic development of nation-states 1. These imaginaries materialized in a 'global polity' 2 , namely the mobilization of a set of social actors toward the governance of a common object. This object (here adult education) is made the explicit subject of political action based on de-territorialized norms. An exemplary case is the Belèm Framework for Action, 3 the consolidated version of which was adopted by the VI International Conference on Adult Education (hereafter CONFINTEA VI), held in 2009 in Belèm (Brazil), under the auspices of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The Belèm Framework for Action 4 lays out prescriptive activities to be implemented at either national or international level within five areas: adult literacy, learners' participation, quality of provision, governmental policy and global governance. In so doing, it focuses attention on the development of comparable statistical indicators, benchmarks and monitoring mechanisms for member states, developmental and aid agencies, and UNESCO with