2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.78.016315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sivashinsky equation for corrugated flames in the large-wrinkle limit

Abstract: Sivashinsky's [Acta Astron. 4, 1177 (1977)] nonlinear integrodifferential equation for the shape of corrugated one-dimensional flames is ultimately reducible to a 2N -body problem, involving the 2N complex poles of the flame slope. Thual, Frisch, and Hénon [J. Phys. (France) 46, 1485 (1985)] derived singular linear integral equations for the pole density in the limit of large steady wrinkles (N>>1) , which they solved exactly for monocoalesced periodic fronts of highest amplitude of wrinkling and approximately… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, we reproduce the results obtained in [20] for −1 ≤ c ≤ 0, and explain and fix the pathologies of (3) for c > 0. The method is valid whatever the sign of c, and generalizes results on wrinkled fronts with two unlike crests per wavelength, which was so far available for the MS equation only [19]. In all the configurations envisaged, we compare the analytical predictions with numerical determinations of the discrete B k and of φ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this way, we reproduce the results obtained in [20] for −1 ≤ c ≤ 0, and explain and fix the pathologies of (3) for c > 0. The method is valid whatever the sign of c, and generalizes results on wrinkled fronts with two unlike crests per wavelength, which was so far available for the MS equation only [19]. In all the configurations envisaged, we compare the analytical predictions with numerical determinations of the discrete B k and of φ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…When N 1, corresponding to large wrinkles, the spacing between consecutive poles scales like B N /N , enabling one to adopt a continuous approximation of the equilibrium conditions, and rewrite them as integral equations for pole densities [17]. As first shown for c = 0 in [19], and confirmed when c < 0 [20], a key step to describe the structure of large steady wrinkles is to first solve the simpler case of isolated crests ; these have infinite wavelengths and poles at Z k = iB k in arbitrary number 2N .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (1) exhibits a number of remarkable features, most notably the existence of poledecompositions whereby the search for ( , ) t x  is converted to a 2N -body problem for the complex poles of the front slope [10,11]; see §2. Thanks to this property one can: (i) Explain the formation of front arches joined by sharper crests whose mergers ultimately produce the widest admissible steady cell; (ii) Access the latter's arc-length vs. wavelength curve [12], which yields the effective flame speed; (iii) Solve stability issues [13,14] without the effect of spurious noises hampering the non-self-adjoint linearized dynamics [15]; (iv) Compute pole density and front shapes for isolated crests, and then for periodic cells [11,16], if 1 N  ; (v) Study stretched crests [17]; (vi) Set up tools to study extensions of (1) that incorporate higher orders of the 1   expansion, at least in the large-N limit ( [18,19] and Refs. therein).…”
Section: Beside Gaseous Combustion the Ms Equation Governs Other Unsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice was already made when drawing Fig.1 [16,23] whatever the value of  is: it is indeed known [23] that  mainly encodes information about the lowest zeros, whence it disappeared from (18).…”
Section: Ms Equation Vs Mp Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the stretch-free case, the uppermost pole altitude increases with the number N of pole pairs, and the typical difference Equation (3.4) is solved by a Fourier method like in [21] (see Appendix A). In terms of an…”
Section: Large Centred Steady Crestsmentioning
confidence: 99%