1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-1335-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Situations, Language and Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach was inspired by the theory proposed by Barwise et al [17]. They have tried to give theoretical semantics model of natural language in a formal logic system.…”
Section: C0: Ist ( Context -Of ( Sherlock Holmes Stories) Holmes Is mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach was inspired by the theory proposed by Barwise et al [17]. They have tried to give theoretical semantics model of natural language in a formal logic system.…”
Section: C0: Ist ( Context -Of ( Sherlock Holmes Stories) Holmes Is mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first approaches: Situation Theory, was proposed by Barwise and Perry [17]. Situation Theory attempts to cover model-theoretic semantics of natural language in a formal logic system [24].…”
Section: Context Process ( Reasoning)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this sort of representation is generally known under the CLE term "quasi-logical form" (hence: QLF), it is for all intents and purposes just Schubert and Pelletier 1982's "ambiguous logical syntax", or Hobbs and Shieber 1987's "wff's with complex terms", or Fenstad et al 1987's "unscoped situation schemata". The idea of deriving (during parsing) unscoped representations from which scoped formulas could be algorithmically derived is standard (and good) practice among theoretically minded computational semanticists.…”
Section: An Employee Represents Each Departmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syntax/Semantics interfaces using unification-based or feature-based formalisms may be found in Shieber 1986, Pollard and Sag 1987, Fenstad et al 1987, and Moore 1989. The primary reason for specifying a syntax/semantics interface in feature structures is that it harmonizes so well with the way in which syntax is now normally described; this close harmony means that syntactic and semantic processing (and indeed other processing, see below) can be as tightly coupled as one wishes-indeed, there needn't be any fundamental distinction between them at all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various versions of the theory have been applied to a number of linguistic issues, resulting in what is commonly known as situation semantics [7,8,10,24,31,33,35,58]. The latter aims at the construction of a unified and mathematically rigorous theory of meaning, and the application of such a theory to natural languages.Mathematical and logical issues that arise within situation theory and situation semantics have been explored in numerous works [8,10,12,24,25,33]. In the past, the development of a mathematicM situation theory has been held back by a lack of availability of appropriate technical tools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%