in Berlin (Germany). We also wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions as well as the editor, Wendy Johnson, for her outstanding support, comments on, and patience with our manuscript. Any opinions and remaining errors are solely our own.Researchers interested in situations and person situation may become associated members of the Situation Research Network (SRN) to be found at http://www.situation-research.com/. The website is intended to (a) compile information on all kinds of situation research, (b) grant access to practical resources (e.g., R codes, scales, etc.), and (c) provide interested researchers a platform for communication and collaboration.Correspondence: John Rauthmann, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany. Phone: 0049-30-20930049-30- -18360049-30- . Fax: 0049-30-2093 jfrauthmann@gmail.com.
Principles of Situation Research 2
AbstractThere is currently no consensus on how to study psychological situations, and situation research is still riddled with problems of conceptualization (What is a situation, what is it not?) and measurement (How can situational information be assessed?). This target article formulates three core principles (with corollaries) to provide a foundation for psychological situation research:The Processing, Reality, and Circularity Principles. These principles build upon each other, ranging from basic to more complex issues (e.g., how to study situations in both objective and subjective terms). They are intended to guide and spur more coherent research programs that produce cumulative knowledge on psychological situations. We conclude with a plea for reallife, multi-method, multi-situation, multi-time, multi-group designs that can illuminate the interwoven dynamics between persons (with their personalities and behavior) and situations. Furnham, & Graham, 1981; Edwards & Templeton, 2005; Endler, 1993;Frederiksen, 1972;Funder, 2006Funder, , 2008Funder, , 2009Furr & Funder, 2004;Hogan, 2009; Kenny, Mohr, & Levesque, 2001; Magnusson, 1981a,b;Rauthmann et al., 2014;Rauthmann, 2012;Reis, 2008;Ross & Nisbett, 1991;Rozin, 2001;Swann & Seyle, 2005;Saucier, Bel-Bahar, & Fernandez, 2007;Sherman, Nave, & Funder, 2010 ten Berge & de Raad, 1999, 2002Wagerman & Funder, 2009;Yang, Read, & Miller, 2006.
Principles of Situation Research 4This target article is an outgrowth of that meeting. Based on its wide-ranging and stimulating discussions, we set out our views on how to move the field of psychological situation research forward. After clarifying terminological issues, we formulate our ideas of the core principles of what situations are (and what they are not), how they operate, and how they may be studied, pursuing two broad aims. First, we hope to raise awareness and alert those interested in conducting research to thorny issues that have bedeviled situation research (and continue to do so). Second, we offer some principles for organizing, guiding, and unifying future research on situations. Third, an important purpose of ...