Situational Leadership Theory

Abstract

In a test of Hersey and Blanchard's situational leadership theory, 91 full-time nurses and their supervisors provided data on employee performance, maturity, and affect as well as leader style. Although directional results were obtained that supported the theory in the low- and moderate-maturity conditions, the magnitude of these results was not significant. Further research in this area is encouraged, with a goal of overcoming the shortcomings of prior research and the obstacles that may be inherent in the study of the proposed processes.

Technical note: a study of Hersey and Blanchard’s situational leadership theory

“…This finding is similar to the research produced by Norris and Vecchio (1992) and will be the subject of further discussion.…”

“…This analysis was designed to control for the possibility that "nonuniformity" may exist across criteria levels (Norris and Vecchio, 1992).…”

Untitled

“…Vecchio (1987) found evidence supporting the theory in employees with "low maturity" but varied support for the two levels of "moderate maturity," and no theoretical support for the expectations of employees with "high maturity." Another study by Norris and Vecchio (1992) resulted in similar conclusions to Vecchio"s first study. Other studies during this time period failed to provide any evidence for the strength of Situational Leadership Theory.…”

Factors contributing to nursing leadership: A systematic review

“…Initiating structure and consideration, as well as role-taking (often linked to cognitive empathy) were also significantly related to leadership effectiveness 26,27 and the use of situational leadership. 27 Relationship-based competencies were reported as more important than financial and technical competencies for leadership effectiveness. 25,28 This was supported by Goldenberg's work 21 where most leaders used a low task and high relationship style.…”