2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Situational impacts on leader ethical decision-making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(102 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this context in mind, this research examines a situation where organizational leaders and followers actively sought to deceive internal and external stakeholders about their treatment of captives under their charge (see Stenmark and Mumford for a more expansive article on situational variables and ethical leadership). The organization is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and their stakeholders include the White House, U.S. Senate, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), media representatives, internal oversight groups, and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this context in mind, this research examines a situation where organizational leaders and followers actively sought to deceive internal and external stakeholders about their treatment of captives under their charge (see Stenmark and Mumford for a more expansive article on situational variables and ethical leadership). The organization is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and their stakeholders include the White House, U.S. Senate, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), media representatives, internal oversight groups, and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on the groundbreaking work of Jones and Bandura, scholars have identified a number of additional situational variables that may influence our decision to engage in unethical behavior (e.g., Detert, Trevino, & Sweitzer, ; Hoyt, Price, & Poatsy, ; Stenmark & Mumford, ). Following is a listing of these situations and an example of how each of these situations might occur within a university setting: Performance pressure (us versus them; winning at all costs) —imagine a college athletic team culture in which everyone is so committed to winning that the team leaders look the other way when a few teammates start using steroids to increase their strength. Threats to self‐efficacy (pressure to be successful) —engineering majors who cheat on a final exam because they are in danger of failing a required class. Decision‐making autonomy (nobody will find out) —a student spends club funds in an inappropriate manner because s/he is confident that nobody will ever find out. Interpersonal conflict (who cares?)…”
Section: Why Leaders Do Not Always Act Ethicallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on the groundbreaking work of Jones and Bandura, scholars have identified a number of additional situational variables that may NEW DIRECTIONS FOR STUDENT LEADERSHIP • DOI: 10.1002/yd influence our decision to engage in unethical behavior (e.g., Detert, Trevino, & Sweitzer, 2008;Hoyt, Price, & Poatsy, 2013;Stenmark & Mumford, 2011). Following is a listing of these situations and an example of how each of these situations might occur within a university setting:…”
Section: Why Leaders Do Not Always Act Ethicallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the adverse impact such intentional and illegal unethical practices can pose to the business community, industry and the ordinary people in the wider community, researchers have paid great attention to leader ethical decision making in the academic literature (Eisenbeiss, 2012;Stenmark & Mumford, 2011). As Brown, Trevino, and Harrison (2005) state ethical leadership relates to "the demonstration of normatively appropriate conduct through personal actions and interpersonal relationships and the promotion of such conduct to followers through two way communication, reinforcement and decision making" (p. 120).…”
Section: Leader Ethical Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%