2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0823-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Siting and sizing of distributed generators based on improved simulated annealing particle swarm optimization

Abstract: Distributed power grids generally contain multiple diverse types of distributed generators (DGs). Traditional particle swarm optimization (PSO) and simulated annealing PSO (SA-PSO) algorithms have some deficiencies in site selection and capacity determination of DGs, such as slow convergence speed and easily falling into local trap. In this paper, an improved SA-PSO (ISA-PSO) algorithm is proposed by introducing crossover and mutation operators of genetic algorithm (GA) into SA-PSO, so that the capabilities of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e SA algorithm is the expansion of the local search algorithm. Different from the local search algorithm, SA accepts a worse solution with a certain probability in iterations to prevent local optimum [20]. Based on this optimization feature, SA has been used in the site selection research [21], manufacturing problem [22], and multiobjective problem [23].…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e SA algorithm is the expansion of the local search algorithm. Different from the local search algorithm, SA accepts a worse solution with a certain probability in iterations to prevent local optimum [20]. Based on this optimization feature, SA has been used in the site selection research [21], manufacturing problem [22], and multiobjective problem [23].…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the optimality of solution is compromised, and the algorithm is validated on static networks thereby deficient in evaluating the dynamic stability of the proposed work. An improved SA‐PSO is proposed in Glover and McMillan by introducing GA's mutation and crossover operators into the traditional SA‐PSO algorithm. This embodied the algorithm with the capabilities for global searching and local exploration to overcome the deficiencies in location selection and capacity finding of DGs such as local optimality and slow convergence speed.…”
Section: Optimisation Algorithms For Dg Allocation Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacity at a given year y and state s is considered to be constrained between maximum and minimum values. The active and reactive capacity limits of exiting REHDGs are given in (27) and 28, respectively. Equations (29) and (30) give the corresponding limits for the new REHDGs.…”
Section: Active and Reactive Power Limits Of Rehdgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intelligent search (IS) based methods are differently employed to solve the optimal sizing and placement of DGs problems. IS methods utilize artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms like the genetic algorithm (GA) [21,22], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [23,24], simulated annealing (SA) [25][26][27], harmony search (HS) [28,29], big bang crunch (BBC) [30,31], the fireworks algorithm (FA) [32,33], and the water drop algorithm (WDA) [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%