2003
DOI: 10.1080/0015587032000145351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sites, sacredness, and stories: Interactions of archaeology and contemporary paganism

Abstract: Folklore has, until very recently, been at the fringes of archaeological research. Post-processual archaeology has promoted plurality in interpretation, however, and archaeology more widely is required to make itself relevant to contemporary society; so, contemporary folkloric practices vis-à-vis archaeological remains are once again receiving attention. In this paper we examine contemporary Pagan understandings of and engagements with "sacred sites" in England. Specifically, we explore how Pagan meanings are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…National heritage authorities usually do not share the beliefs of Pagan groups and are concerned about preserving the site rather than keeping the place alive. A wellknown case is Stonehenge, where English Heritage banned solstice parties because partying was perceived as secular and non-spiritual and therefore not appropriate for a sacred place (Wallis & Blain 2003). Members of the Estonian Maavalla Koda have published multiple articles in local newspapers to emphasise the unfitness of inorganic materials as deposits, and it currently seems that the amount of plastic objects is decreasing at most sites.…”
Section: Cleaning Of the Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National heritage authorities usually do not share the beliefs of Pagan groups and are concerned about preserving the site rather than keeping the place alive. A wellknown case is Stonehenge, where English Heritage banned solstice parties because partying was perceived as secular and non-spiritual and therefore not appropriate for a sacred place (Wallis & Blain 2003). Members of the Estonian Maavalla Koda have published multiple articles in local newspapers to emphasise the unfitness of inorganic materials as deposits, and it currently seems that the amount of plastic objects is decreasing at most sites.…”
Section: Cleaning Of the Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. (2002, 19) St Nectan's Glen has evidently become a contested site, entering the 'ritual litter' debate that has become relatively common at places of historical or spiritual significance (Houlbrook 2015a;Rountree 2006;Wallis and Blain 2003). Whether the coins, ribbons, candles, and rubber duck are classified as offerings or 'hideous rubbish', to use Gary's phrase, is entirely dependent upon the personal or professional perspective of the observer.…”
Section: St Nectan's Glen Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poetic form of knowledge that he celebrates is not based on academic skills of analysis and observation. Others make still grander claims that they can ‘see’ the landscape in the same manner as a Neolithic shaman, with ‘Western rational and linear perspectives… set aside’ (Wallis and Blain : 311). Such attitudes reflect the solecism inherent in almost all New Age thinking, with its stress on ‘the spirituality which lies within the person’, rather than on the external influences on the person (Heelas : 2).…”
Section: Towards a Political Reading Of The New Agementioning
confidence: 99%